ArticleMedical physics2016
A model-based scatter artifacts correction for cone beam CT.
Article in Medical physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of online dose-guided adaptive fractionation for intact prostate radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- No Reproducibility, No Progress: Rethinking CT Benchmarking.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- A Hybrid Approach Combining Dual-Energy and Inpainting Methods for Metal Artifact Reduction in Dentomaxillofacial CBCT: A Proof-of-Concept Phantom Study.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Investigation of 2D anti-scatter grid implementation in a gantry-mounted cone beam computed tomography system for proton therapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a compact cone beam CT concept with high image fidelity for point-of-care brain imaging.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Self-supervised learning for CT image denoising and reconstruction: a review.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Review
- Frequency-Domain-Based Structure Losses for CycleGAN-Based Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Translation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- The OpenGATE ecosystem for Monte Carlo simulation in medical physics.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022Review
- Assessing organ at risk position variation and its impact on delivered dose in kidney SABR.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2022Article
- Adaptive proton therapy.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Review
- Comparison of Supervised and Unsupervised Approaches for the Generation of Synthetic CT from Cone-Beam CT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Developments in deep learning based corrections of cone beam computed tomography to enable dose calculations for adaptive radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2020Article
- A single neural network for cone-beam computed tomography-based radiotherapy of head-and-neck, lung and breast cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2020Article
- Obtaining dual-energy computed tomography (CT) information from a single-energy CT image for quantitative imaging analysis of living subjects by using deep learning.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2020Article
- Shading correction for volumetric CT using deep convolutional neural network and adaptive filter.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2019Article
- Fast shading correction for cone-beam CT via partitioned tissue classification.Physics in medicine and biology · 2019Article
- Evaluation and Clinical Application of a Commercially Available Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm for CBCT-Based IGRT.Technology in cancer research & treatment · 2019Article
- Cone-Beam CT image contrast and attenuation-map linearity improvement (CALI) for brain stereotactic radiosurgery procedures.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2018Article
- Dynamic fluence field modulation for miscentered patients in computed tomography.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDue to the increased axial coverage of multislice computed tomography (CT) and the introduction of flat detectors, the size of x-ray illumination fields has grown dramatically, causing an increase in scatter radiation. For CT imaging, scatter is a significant issue that introduces shading artifact, streaks, as well as reduced contrast and Hounsfield Units (HU) accuracy. The purpose of this work is to provide a fast and accurate scatter artifacts correction algorithm for cone beam CT (CBCT) imaging.
methodsThe method starts with an estimation of coarse scatter profiles for a set of CBCT data in either image domain or projection domain. A denoising algorithm designed specifically for Poisson signals is then applied to derive the final scatter distribution. Qualitative and quantitative evaluations using thorax and abdomen phantoms with Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, experimental Catphan phantom data, and in vivo human data acquired for a clinical image guided radiation therapy were performed. Scatter correction in both projection domain and image domain was conducted and the influences of segmentation method, mismatched attenuation coefficients, and spectrum model as well as parameter selection were also investigated.
resultsResults show that the proposed algorithm can significantly reduce scatter artifacts and recover the correct HU in either projection domain or image domain. For the MC thorax phantom study, four-components segmentation yields the best results, while the results of three-components segmentation are still acceptable. The parameters (iteration number K and weight β) affect the accuracy of the scatter correction and the results get improved as K and β increase. It was found that variations in attenuation coefficient accuracies only slightly impact the performance of the proposed processing. For the Catphan phantom data, the mean value over all pixels in the residual image is reduced from -21.8 to -0.2 HU and 0.7 HU for projection domain and image domain, respectively. The contrast of the in vivo human images is greatly improved after correction.
conclusionsThe software-based technique has a number of advantages, such as high computational efficiency and accuracy, and the capability of performing scatter correction without modifying the clinical workflow (i.e., no extra scan/measurement data are needed) or modifying the imaging hardware. When implemented practically, this should improve the accuracy of CBCT image quantitation and significantly impact CBCT-based interventional procedures and adaptive radiation therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.