Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27036140›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Impact of health insurance status changes on healthcare utilisation patterns: a longitudinal cohort study in South Korea.

Jae-Hyun Kim, Sang Gyu Lee, Kwang-Soo Lee, Sung-In Jang, Kyung-Hee Cho, Eun-Cheol Park

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. What Are the Determinants of the Decision to Purchase Private Health Insurance in China?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jae-Hyun KimDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang Gyu LeeInstitute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kwang-Soo LeeDepartment of Health Administration, College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University, Wonju, gwangwondo, Republic of Korea.
Sung-In JangInstitute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyung-Hee ChoInstitute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eun-Cheol ParkInstitute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yonsei University · KRAjou University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe study examined medical care utilisation by health insurance status changes.

settingThe Korean Welfare Panel Study (KoWePs) was used.

participantsThis study analysed 14,267 participants at baseline (2006).

interventionsThe individuals were categorised into four health insurance status groups: continuous health insurance, change from health insurance to Medical Aid, change from Medical Aid to health insurance, or continuous Medical Aid. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Three dependent variables were also analysed: days spent in hospital; number of outpatient visits; and hospitalisations per year. Longitudinal data analysis was used to determine whether changes in health insurance status were associated with healthcare utilisation.

resultsThe number of outpatient visits per year was 0.1.363 times higher (p<0.0001) in the continuous Medical Aid than in the continuous health insurance group. The number of hospitalisations per year was 1.560 times higher (p<0.001) in new Medical Aid and -0.636 times lower (p<0.001) in new health insurance than in continuous health insurance group. The number of days spent in hospital per year was -0.567 times lower (p=0.021) in the new health insurance than in the continuous health insurance group.

conclusionsHealth insurance beneficiaries with a coverage level lower than Medical Aid showed lower healthcare utilisation, as measured by the number of hospitalisations and days spent in hospital per year.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmbulatory CareFemaleHospitalizationHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareRepublic of KoreaYoung AdultHEALTH ECONOMICSHEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENT

Identifiers

PMID27036140
PMCPMC4823444
OpenAlexW2333064591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.