Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27036119›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

Nemo-like kinase as a negative regulator of nuclear receptor Nurr1 gene transcription in prostate cancer.

Jian Wang, Zhi-Hong Yang, Hua Chen, Hua-Hui Li, Li-Yong Chen, Zhu Zhu, Ying Zou, Cong-Cong Ding, Jing Yang, Zhi-Wei He

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Atypical MAPKs in cancer.The FEBS journal · 2025
    Review
  3. cAMP response element-binding protein: A credible cancer drug target.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jian WangSino-American Cancer Research Institute, Key Laboratory for Medical Molecular Diagnostics of Guangdong Province, Dongguan Scientific Research Center, Guangdong Medical University, 1 Xincheng Road, Dongguan, 523808, China.
Zhi-Hong YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Longgang District Central Hospital of Shenzhen, 1228 Longgang Road, Shenzhen, 518116, China.
Hua ChenSino-American Cancer Research Institute, Key Laboratory for Medical Molecular Diagnostics of Guangdong Province, Dongguan Scientific Research Center, Guangdong Medical University, 1 Xincheng Road, Dongguan, 523808, China.
Hua-Hui LiSino-American Cancer Research Institute, Key Laboratory for Medical Molecular Diagnostics of Guangdong Province, Dongguan Scientific Research Center, Guangdong Medical University, 1 Xincheng Road, Dongguan, 523808, China.
Li-Yong ChenSino-American Cancer Research Institute, Key Laboratory for Medical Molecular Diagnostics of Guangdong Province, Dongguan Scientific Research Center, Guangdong Medical University, 1 Xincheng Road, Dongguan, 523808, China.
Zhu ZhuSino-American Cancer Research Institute, Key Laboratory for Medical Molecular Diagnostics of Guangdong Province, Dongguan Scientific Research Center, Guangdong Medical University, 1 Xincheng Road, Dongguan, 523808, China.
Ying ZouSino-American Cancer Research Institute, Key Laboratory for Medical Molecular Diagnostics of Guangdong Province, Dongguan Scientific Research Center, Guangdong Medical University, 1 Xincheng Road, Dongguan, 523808, China.
Cong-Cong DingSino-American Cancer Research Institute, Key Laboratory for Medical Molecular Diagnostics of Guangdong Province, Dongguan Scientific Research Center, Guangdong Medical University, 1 Xincheng Road, Dongguan, 523808, China.
Jing YangDepartment of Biochemistry, Liaoning Medical University, 40 Songpo Road, Jinzhou, 121001, China. lnmuyangjing@126.com.
Zhi-Wei HeSino-American Cancer Research Institute, Key Laboratory for Medical Molecular Diagnostics of Guangdong Province, Dongguan Scientific Research Center, Guangdong Medical University, 1 Xincheng Road, Dongguan, 523808, China. zhiweihe66832@126.com.
Guangdong Medical College · CNJinzhou Medical University · CNLonggang Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurr1, a member of the orphan receptor family, plays an important role in several types of cancer. Our previous work demonstrated that increased expression of Nurr1 plays a significant role in the initiation and progression of prostate cancer (PCa), though the mechanisms for regulation of Nurr1 expression remain unknown. In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that Nemo-like kinase (NLK) is a key regulator of Nurr1 expression in PCa.

methodsImmunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis were used to evaluate levels of NLK and Nurr1 in prostatic tissues and cell lines. The effects of overexpression or knockdown of Nurr1 were evaluated in PCa cells through use of PCR, Western blots and promoter reporter assays. The role of Nurr1 promoter cis element was studied by creation of two mutant Nurr1 promoter luciferase constructs, one with a mutated NF-κB binding site and one with a mutated CREB binding site. In addition, three specific inhibitors were used to investigate the roles of these proteins in transcriptional activation of Nurr1, including BAY 11-7082 (NF-κB inhibitor), KG-501 (CREB inhibitor) and ICG-001 (CREB binding protein, CBP, inhibitor). The function of CBP in NLK-mediated regulation of Nurr1 expression was investigated using immunofluorescence, co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays (ChIPs).

resultsNLK expression was inversely correlated with Nurr1 expression in prostate cancer tissues and cell lines. Overexpression of NLK suppressed Nurr1 promoter activity, leading to downregulation of Nurr1 expression. In contrast, knockdown of NLK demonstrated opposite results, leading to upregulation of Nurr1. When compared with the wild-type Nurr1 promoter, mutation of NF-κB- and CREB-binding sites of the Nurr1 promoter region significantly reduced the upregulation of Nurr1 induced by knockdown of NLK in LNCaP cells; treatment with inhibitors of CREB, CBP and NF-κB led to similar results. We also found that NLK directly interacts with CBP, that knockdown of NLK significantly increases the recruitment of CBP to both NF-κB- and CREB-binding sites, and that regulation of NLK on Nurr1 expression is abrogated by knockdown of CBP.

conclusionsOur results suggest that NLK inhibits transcriptional activation of Nurr1 gene by impeding CBP's role as a co-activator of NF-κB and CREB in prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Binding SitesCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCREB-Binding ProteinCyclic AMP Response Element-Binding ProteinDNA-Binding ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMaleNF-kappa BNuclear Receptor Subfamily 4, Group A, Member 2Promoter Regions, GeneticProstatic NeoplasmsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTranscriptional ActivationCREB1 protein, humanCREB-Binding ProteinCyclic AMP Response Element-Binding ProteinDNA-Binding ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsNF-kappa BNLK protein, humanNR4A2 protein, humanNuclear Receptor Subfamily 4, Group A, Member 2Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesCBPCREBNF-κBNLKNurr1Prostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID27036119
PMCPMC4815267
OpenAlexW2329412866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.