Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27036111›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2016

Acthar gel in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome: a multicenter retrospective case series.

Arvind Madan, Snezana Mijovic-Das, Ana Stankovic, Geoffrey Teehan, Amber S Milward, Anupa Khastgir

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ActharClinical drug investigation · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Synthetic ACTH for Treatment of Glomerular Diseases: A Case Series.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. New strategies and perspectives on managing IgA nephropathy.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arvind MadanNephrology Associates of Central Florida, 3885 Oakwater Circle, Orlando, FL, 32806, USA.
Snezana Mijovic-DasAlbany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
Ana StankovicHCA Inc. Physician Services, Salem, NH, USA.
Geoffrey TeehanLankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA, USA.
Amber S MilwardNephrology Associates of Central Florida, 3885 Oakwater Circle, Orlando, FL, 32806, USA.
Anupa KhastgirNephrology Practice, 3366 NW Expressway, Bldg D, Suite 280, Oklahoma City, OK, 73112, USA. akhastgir@khastgirmedical.com.
Albany Medical Center Hospital · USLankenau Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent first-line anti-proteinuric treatments for nephrotic syndrome (NS) do not produce an effective response in all patients and are not tolerated by some patients. Additional effective and tolerable treatment options in NS are strongly needed. This retrospective case series is the largest to date to examine Acthar gel (adrenocorticotropic hormone, ACTH) in patients with varied-etiology NS.

methodsThis multicenter retrospective case series included adult patients with NS (N = 44) treated with Acthar gel at 6 clinical practices. NS etiologies included idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS, 15), idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN, 11), IgA nephropathy (IgAN, 5), diabetic nephropathy (DN, 4), systemic lupus erythematosus class V membranous lupus nephritis (MLN, 2), minimal change disease (MCD, 2), membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN, 1), fibrillary glomerulonephritis (FGN, 1), and unbiopsied NS (3). Proteinuria response was assessed as percent reduction from baseline and percent of patients meeting complete remission (final proteinuria <500 mg/d), partial remission (≥50 % reduction in proteinuria from baseline and final proteinuria 500-3500 mg/d), clinical response (≥30 % reduction in proteinuria from baseline that did not meet criteria for complete or partial remission), and no response (failed to meet remission or clinical response criteria) following Acthar gel therapy. Safety and tolerability were examined using adverse event (AE) frequency reported by patients or treating nephrologists and frequency of early discontinuation of treatment due to AEs.

results68.2 % (30/44) of patients had received prior NS treatment with immunosuppressive or cytotoxic therapies. Thirty-seven patients completed Acthar gel treatment. Seven patients (15.9 %) had early termination due to AEs, including weight gain (2), hypertension (2), edema (1), fatigue (1), seizures (1) and for reasons not stated (2). Proteinuria reduction ≥30 % was shown in 81.1 % (30/37) of patients and 62.2 % (23/37) showed ≥50 % proteinuria reduction. Proteinuria responses were greatest in MCD (n = 2/2 complete remission), MLN (n = 2/2 partial remission), MPGN (n = 1/1 partial remission), FSGS (n = 12/15 [80.0 %] partial remission or clinical response), and iMN (n = 8/11 [72.7 %] complete remission, partial remission, or clinical response).

conclusionsActhar gel may meet an important treatment need in patients with treatment-resistant NS in response to first-line therapies, patients unable to tolerate first-line therapies, and in patients with advanced disease.

Indexed as

Adrenocorticotropic HormoneAdultAgedCohort StudiesDiabetic NephropathiesFemaleGelsGlomerulonephritis, IGAGlomerulonephritis, MembranoproliferativeGlomerulonephritis, MembranousGlomerulosclerosis, Focal SegmentalHormonesHumansLupus NephritisMaleMiddle AgedAdrenocorticotropic HormoneGelsHormonesACTHActhar gelNephrotic syndromeProteinuria

Identifiers

PMID27036111
PMCPMC4815175
OpenAlexW2318919436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.