ArticleBMC nephrology2016
Acthar gel in the treatment of nephrotic syndrome: a multicenter retrospective case series.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Repository Corticotropin Injection Compared With Synthetic ACTHClinical pharmacology in drug development · 2022Trial
- Acthar Gel versus standard of care for adults with proteinuria in nephrotic syndrome due to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: cost-per-response analysis from the US healthcare perspective.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Article
- Adherence to Acthar Gel (RCI) and Outcomes in Patients with Membranous Nephropathy: A Claims Database Analysis.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Article
- Cost per Response of Acthar® Gel vs Standard of Care for the Treatment of Proteinuria in Nephrotic Syndrome Due to Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy Among Adults from the US Healthcare Perspective.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2025Article
- Clinical assessment of the potential use of a novel single-dose prefilled injection device for the administration of Acthar Gel in children: a narrative review.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- ActharClinical drug investigation · 2023Review
- Hematopoietic-specific melanocortin 1 receptor signaling protects against nephrotoxic serum nephritis and mediates the beneficial effect of melanocortin therapy.Kidney international · 2023Article
- Acthar Gel (RCI): A Narrative Literature Review of Clinical and Economic Evidence.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2023Review
- Real-word adrenocorticotropic hormone treatment for childhood-onset nephrotic syndrome.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Repository Corticotropin in Treating de novo C3 Glomerulonephritis after Transplantation.Glomerular diseases · 2022Article
- Real-world treatment patterns for repository corticotropin injection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Drugs in context · 2022Article
- Synthetic ACTH for Treatment of Glomerular Diseases: A Case Series.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2022Article
- Repository Corticotropin Injections Promote Clinical Remission and Regulatory T Cell Expansion in Membranous Nephropathy.Kidney international reports · 2021Article
- Melanocortin System in Kidney Homeostasis and Disease: Novel Therapeutic Opportunities.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- Repository corticotropin injection versus corticosteroids for protection against renal damage in a focal segmental glomerulosclerosis rodent model.BMC nephrology · 2020Article
- Autoimmunity in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: A Long-Standing Yet Elusive Association.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Review
- ACTH Treatment for Management of Nephrotic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Reappraisal.International journal of nephrology · 2020Article
- New strategies and perspectives on managing IgA nephropathy.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent first-line anti-proteinuric treatments for nephrotic syndrome (NS) do not produce an effective response in all patients and are not tolerated by some patients. Additional effective and tolerable treatment options in NS are strongly needed. This retrospective case series is the largest to date to examine Acthar gel (adrenocorticotropic hormone, ACTH) in patients with varied-etiology NS.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective case series included adult patients with NS (N = 44) treated with Acthar gel at 6 clinical practices. NS etiologies included idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS, 15), idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN, 11), IgA nephropathy (IgAN, 5), diabetic nephropathy (DN, 4), systemic lupus erythematosus class V membranous lupus nephritis (MLN, 2), minimal change disease (MCD, 2), membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN, 1), fibrillary glomerulonephritis (FGN, 1), and unbiopsied NS (3). Proteinuria response was assessed as percent reduction from baseline and percent of patients meeting complete remission (final proteinuria <500 mg/d), partial remission (≥50 % reduction in proteinuria from baseline and final proteinuria 500-3500 mg/d), clinical response (≥30 % reduction in proteinuria from baseline that did not meet criteria for complete or partial remission), and no response (failed to meet remission or clinical response criteria) following Acthar gel therapy. Safety and tolerability were examined using adverse event (AE) frequency reported by patients or treating nephrologists and frequency of early discontinuation of treatment due to AEs.
results68.2 % (30/44) of patients had received prior NS treatment with immunosuppressive or cytotoxic therapies. Thirty-seven patients completed Acthar gel treatment. Seven patients (15.9 %) had early termination due to AEs, including weight gain (2), hypertension (2), edema (1), fatigue (1), seizures (1) and for reasons not stated (2). Proteinuria reduction ≥30 % was shown in 81.1 % (30/37) of patients and 62.2 % (23/37) showed ≥50 % proteinuria reduction. Proteinuria responses were greatest in MCD (n = 2/2 complete remission), MLN (n = 2/2 partial remission), MPGN (n = 1/1 partial remission), FSGS (n = 12/15 [80.0 %] partial remission or clinical response), and iMN (n = 8/11 [72.7 %] complete remission, partial remission, or clinical response).
conclusionsActhar gel may meet an important treatment need in patients with treatment-resistant NS in response to first-line therapies, patients unable to tolerate first-line therapies, and in patients with advanced disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.