ArticlePLoS computational biology2016
Robust Brain-Machine Interface Design Using Optimal Feedback Control Modeling and Adaptive Point Process Filtering.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feedback control policies employed by people using intracortical brain-computer interfaces.Journal of neural engineering · 2017Trial
- Duration-modulated neural population dynamics in humans during BMI controls.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Augmented State-Space Modeling and Control of Latent Arousal States Under Inhibitory and Excitatory Conditions.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Prioritized learning of cross-population neural dynamics.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Neuromorphic algorithms for brain implants: a review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- Nonlinear model predictive control of a conductance-based neuron model via data-driven forecasting.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- Event detection and classification from multimodal time series with application to neural data.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- Calibrating Bayesian Decoders of Neural Spiking Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Multimodal subspace identification for modeling discrete-continuous spiking and field potential population activity.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- Modeling and dissociation of intrinsic and input-driven neural population dynamics underlying behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Decoding motor plans using a closed-loop ultrasonic brain-machine interface.Nature neuroscience · 2024Article
- Unsupervised learning of stationary and switching dynamical system models from Poisson observations.Journal of neural engineering · 2023Article
- Invariant neural dynamics drive commands to control different movements.Current biology : CB · 2023Article
- AnFrontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Real-time brain-machine interface in non-human primates achieves high-velocity prosthetic finger movements using a shallow feedforward neural network decoder.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Validation of a non-invasive, real-time, human-in-the-loop model of intracortical brain-computer interfaces.Journal of neural engineering · 2022Article
- Neural Decoders Using Reinforcement Learning in Brain Machine Interfaces: A Technical Review.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Review
- Real-Time Control of a Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Mirror Myoelectric Interface During Functional Task Training.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Capturing spike train temporal pattern with wavelet average coefficient for brain machine interface.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Improving scalability in systems neuroscience.Neuron · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Much progress has been made in brain-machine interfaces (BMI) using decoders such as Kalman filters and finding their parameters with closed-loop decoder adaptation (CLDA). However, current decoders do not model the spikes directly, and hence may limit the processing time-scale of BMI control and adaptation. Moreover, while specialized CLDA techniques for intention estimation and assisted training exist, a unified and systematic CLDA framework that generalizes across different setups is lacking. Here we develop a novel closed-loop BMI training architecture that allows for processing, control, and adaptation using spike events, enables robust control and extends to various tasks. Moreover, we develop a unified control-theoretic CLDA framework within which intention estimation, assisted training, and adaptation are performed. The architecture incorporates an infinite-horizon optimal feedback-control (OFC) model of the brain's behavior in closed-loop BMI control, and a point process model of spikes. The OFC model infers the user's motor intention during CLDA-a process termed intention estimation. OFC is also used to design an autonomous and dynamic assisted training technique. The point process model allows for neural processing, control and decoder adaptation with every spike event and at a faster time-scale than current decoders; it also enables dynamic spike-event-based parameter adaptation unlike current CLDA methods that use batch-based adaptation on much slower adaptation time-scales. We conducted closed-loop experiments in a non-human primate over tens of days to dissociate the effects of these novel CLDA components. The OFC intention estimation improved BMI performance compared with current intention estimation techniques. OFC assisted training allowed the subject to consistently achieve proficient control. Spike-event-based adaptation resulted in faster and more consistent performance convergence compared with batch-based methods, and was robust to parameter initialization. Finally, the architecture extended control to tasks beyond those used for CLDA training. These results have significant implications towards the development of clinically-viable neuroprosthetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.