Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27035810›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2016

Exosomes in stroke pathogenesis and therapy.

Zheng Gang Zhang, Michael Chopp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pleiotropic Effects of Exosomes as a Therapy for Stroke Recovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Exercise-induced extracellular vesicles derived from platelet-rich plasma improved recovery after ischemic stroke.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zheng Gang Zhang
Michael Chopp

Funding

miR-17-92 exosome treatment of strokeR01NS088656 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI CHOPP, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
Ac-SDKP for Treatment of Acute StrokeR01NS079612 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ZHANG, ZHENG GANG · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
MicroRNAs and neurogenesis after strokeR01NS075156 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ZHANG, ZHENG GANG · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS075156NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS079612NINDS NIH HHS R01NS079612NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. Stroke recovery is orchestrated by a set of highly interactive processes that involve the neurovascular unit and neural stem cells. Emerging data suggest that exosomes play an important role in intercellular communication by transferring exosomal protein and RNA cargo between source and target cells in the brain. Here, we review these advances and their impact on promoting coupled brain remodeling processes after stroke. The use of exosomes for therapeutic applications in stroke is also highlighted.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainExosomesHumansNerve Tissue ProteinsNeural Stem CellsRNAStrokeNerve Tissue ProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID27035810
PMCPMC4811130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.