SynthesisScientific reports2016
Possible association of CCDC62 rs12817488 polymorphism and Parkinson's disease risk in Chinese population: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Analysis of the Roles of the CCDC Protein Family Play in a Range of 58 Disease Processes.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Coiled-Coil Domain-Containing (CCDC) Proteins: Functional Roles in General and Male Reproductive Physiology.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2021Review
- Genetic Determinants of Parkinson's Disease: Can They Help to Stratify the Patients Based on the Underlying Molecular Defect?Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conflicting results identifying the association between coiled-coil domain containing 62 (CCDC62) polymorphism, rs12817488, and Parkinson's disease (PD) have been reported. To clarify whether rs12817488 is related to PD risk in Chinese population, we carried out this meta-analysis by searching literature from PubMed and Embase database regarding this polymorphism. Three eligible studies involving 1616 cases and 1649 controls were included in this meta-analysis. Our results showed statistically significant association between rs12817488 and PD risk in all four genetic models. Stratification by gender revealed similar results in both subgroup in these genetic models except for recessive model, in which rs12817488 was not significantly associated with PD in male subgroup. Unstable result was found in recessive model via sensitivity analysis, and publication bias was observed in recessive model as well, indicating that the pooled result from recessive model should be cautiously treated. Our meta-analysis implicates a possible relationship between rs12817488 and PD risk in Chinese population. Further validation of this association in large sample size study with different gender is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.