Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27034976›Full record

ReviewScience advances2016

HOXs and lincRNAs: Two sides of the same coin.

Bony De Kumar, Robb Krumlauf

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science advances, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Biology of Hox Genes: Questions and Technological Challenges.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Transcriptional Regulation and Implications for ControllingJournal of developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Long noncoding RNAThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bony De KumarStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8398-3775
Robb KrumlaufStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
Stowers Institute for Medical Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clustered Hox genes play fundamental roles in regulation of axial patterning and elaboration of the basic body plan in animal development. There are common features in the organization and regulatory landscape of Hox clusters associated with their highly conserved functional roles. The presence of transcribed noncoding sequences embedded within the vertebrate Hox clusters is providing insight into a new layer of regulatory information associated with Hox genes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGenes, HomeoboxRNA, Long NoncodingAnimalsEvolution, MolecularGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMultigene FamilyTranscriptional ActivationRNA, Long Noncodinggene regulationHox geneslincRNAsnon-coding RNAs

Identifiers

PMID27034976
PMCPMC4805430
OpenAlexW2276501963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.