Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27034867›Full record

ArticleCase reports in oncological medicine2016

Laparoscopic Resection of Recurrence from Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Liver Transplantation: Case Reports and Review of the Literature.

Mushegh A Sahakyan, Airazat M Kazaryan, Ewa Pomianowska, Andreas Abildgaard, Pål-Dag Line, Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth, Bjørn Edwin, Bård Ingvald Røsok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in oncological medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mushegh A SahakyanThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0027 Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Research, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway; Department of Surgery No. 1, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, 0025 Yerevan, Armenia.ORCID 0000-0002-4815-7694
Airazat M KazaryanThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0027 Oslo, Norway; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway.
Ewa PomianowskaDepartment of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0407 Oslo, Norway.
Andreas AbildgaardDepartment of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0027 Oslo, Norway.
Pål-Dag LineDepartment of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn Atle BjørnbethDepartment of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0407 Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn EdwinThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0027 Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Research, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway; Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0407 Oslo, Norway.
Bård Ingvald RøsokDepartment of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, 0407 Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) indicates a poor prognosis. Surgery is considered the only curative option for selected patients with HCC recurrence following LT. Traditionally, the preference is given to the open approach. Methods. In this report, we present two cases of laparoscopic resections (LR) for recurrent HCC after LT, performed at Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet. Results. Both procedures were executed without intraoperative and postoperative adverse events. Whereas one of the patients had a recurrence one year after LR, the other patient did not have any sign of disease during 3-year follow-up. Conclusions. We argue that, in selected cases, patients with HCC recurrence following LT may benefit from LR due to its limited tissue trauma and timely start of subsequent treatment if curative resection cannot be obtained. In patients with relatively favorable prognosis, LR facilitates postoperative recovery course and avoids unnecessary laparotomy.

Identifiers

PMID27034867
PMCPMC4791493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.