ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2016
Health disparities in colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities in the United States.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05174286 (Community Health Workers United to Reduce Colorectal Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Among People at Higher Risk), which is not on this map. Cited by 131 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Community Health Workers United to Reduce Colorectal Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Among People at Higher Risk
Who cites it
131 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 187 citations in OpenAlex.
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Survival among Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: ASCO Guideline.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Age-standardised incidence rate and epidemiology of colorectal cancer in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of U.S.-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Intervention Systematic Reviews: Available Evidence and Lessons Learned for Research and Practice.Frontiers in public health · 2019Pooled it
- Facilitation of Health Plan-Clinic Partnerships to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening for Rural Medicaid Enrollees: A Qualitative Study.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026Trial
- Colorectal cancer lifetime risk accuracy and behavior change intentions before and after risk assessment.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Factors Associated with Ever Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Testing Among Adults in the United States.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Paid sick leave and cancer-related outcomes in the U.S. workforce: evidence from a scoping review.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- The Enteric Microbiome in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Its Role as a Biomarker of Disease.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Assessing Racial Disparities in Guideline-Concordant Care and Clinical Outcomes after Surgical Resection of Nonmetastatic Colon Cancer at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.Cancer research communications · 2025Article
- Associations of Social Vulnerability and Race-Ethnicity With Gastrointestinal Cancers in the United States.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Enhancing CRC Screening in a Predominantly Hispanic Community: Effectiveness of 1-Day vs. 3-Day Stool-Based Testing Kits.Journal of community health · 2025Observational
- Advancements in Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiac Sarcomas: A Comprehensive Review.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
- Inequalities in colorectal cancer diagnosis by ethnic group: a population-level study in the English National Health Service.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Perceptions of Implementing Real-Time Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes and Digital Analytics in a Majority-Minority Cancer Center.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Management of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC): Real-World Recommendations.South Asian journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Trends in 5-year cancer survival disparities by race and ethnicity in the US between 2002-2006 and 2015-2019.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Sociocultural and masculinity influences on colorectal cancer screening participation among Hispanic/Latino men in Florida, New York, and Texas.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Race adjustments in clinical algorithms can help correct for racial disparities in data quality.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the 2010 Census, just over one-third of the United States (US) population identified themselves as being something other than being non-Hispanic white alone. This group has increased in size from 86.9 million in 2000 to 111.9 million in 2010, representing an increase of 29 percent over the ten year period. Per the American Cancer Society, racial and ethnic minorities are more likely to develop cancer and die from it when compared to the general population of the United States. This is particularly true for colorectal cancer (CRC). The primary aim of this review is to highlight the disparities in CRC among racial and ethnic minorities in the United States. Despite overall rates of CRC decreasing nationally and within certain racial and ethnic minorities in the US, there continue to be disparities in incidence and mortality when compared to non-Hispanic whites. The disparities in CRC incidence and mortality are related to certain areas of deficiency such as knowledge of family history, access to care obstacles, impact of migration on CRC and paucity of clinical data. These areas of deficiency limit understanding of CRC's impact in these groups and when developing interventions to close the disparity gap. Even with the implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Healthcare Act, disparities in CRC screening will continue to exist until specific interventions are implemented in the context of each of racial and ethnic group. Racial and ethnic minorities cannot be viewed as one monolithic group, rather as different segments since there are variations in incidence and mortality based on natural history of CRC development impacted by gender, ethnicity group, nationality, access, as well as migration and socioeconomic status. Progress has been made overall, but there is much work to be done.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.