Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27034806›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2016

Immune targeting of cancer stem cells in gastrointestinal oncology.

Robert J Canter, Steven K Grossenbacher, Erik Ames, William J Murphy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Of Cytometry, Stem Cells and Fountain of Youth.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2017
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert J Canter1 Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, 2 Laboratory of Cancer Immunology, Department of Dermatology, 3 Department of Dermatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Steven K Grossenbacher1 Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, 2 Laboratory of Cancer Immunology, Department of Dermatology, 3 Department of Dermatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Erik Ames1 Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, 2 Laboratory of Cancer Immunology, Department of Dermatology, 3 Department of Dermatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
William J Murphy1 Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, 2 Laboratory of Cancer Immunology, Department of Dermatology, 3 Department of Dermatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis postulates that a sub-population of quiescent cells exist within tumors which are resistant to conventional cytotoxic/anti-proliferative therapies. It is these CSCs which then seed tumor relapse, even in cases of apparent complete response to systemic therapy. Therefore, therapies, such as immunotherapy, which add a specific anti-CSC strategy to standard cytoreductive treatments may provide a promising new direction for future cancer therapies. CSCs are an attractive target for immune therapies since, unlike chemotherapy or radiotherapy, immune effector cells do not specifically require target cells to be proliferating in order to effectively kill them. Although recent advances have been made in the development of novel systemic and targeted therapies for advanced gastro-intestinal (GI) malignancies, there remains an unmet need for durable new therapies for these refractory malignancies. Novel immunotherapeutic strategies targeting CSCs are in pre-clinical and clinical development across the spectrum of the immune system, including strategies utilizing adaptive immune cell-based effectors, innate immune effectors, as well as vaccine approaches. Lastly, since important CSC functions are affected by the tumor microenvironment, targeting of both cellular (myeloid derived suppressor cells and tumor-associated macrophages) and sub-cellular (cytokines, chemokines, and PD1/PDL1) components of the tumor microenvironment is under investigation in the immune targeting of CSCs. These efforts are adding to the significant optimism about the potential utility of immunotherapy to overcome cancer resistance mechanisms and cure greater numbers of patients with advanced malignancy.

Indexed as

aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)Cancer stem cells (CSCs)CD133CD24CD44EpCAMimmunotherapynatural killer (NK) cellsT cellsvaccines

Identifiers

PMID27034806
PMCPMC4783622
OpenAlexW2196161616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.