Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27034788›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2016

Variation of tumoral marker after radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Mirko D'Onofrio, Emilio Barbi, Roberto Girelli, Paolo Tinazzi Martini, Riccardo De Robertis, Valentina Ciaravino, Roberto Salvia, Giovanni Butturini, Isabella Frigerio, Teresa Milazzo and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Percutaneous ablation of pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mirko D'Onofrio1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Emilio Barbi1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Roberto Girelli1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Paolo Tinazzi Martini1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Riccardo De Robertis1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Valentina Ciaravino1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Roberto Salvia1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giovanni Butturini1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Isabella Frigerio1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Teresa Milazzo1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Stefano Crosara1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Salvatore Paiella1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Paolo Pederzoli1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Claudio Bassi1 Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy ; 2 Department of Radiology, 3 Department of Surgery, Casa di Cura Dott. Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy ; 4 Department of Surgery, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the correlation between variations of CA 19.9 blood levels and the entity of necrosis at CT after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

methodsIn this study, from June 2010 to February 2014, patients with diagnosis of unresectable and not metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, expressing tumor marker CA 19.9, treated with RFA procedure were included. All these patients underwent RFA. CT study was performed 1 week after RFA. The dosage of CA 19.9 levels was performed 1 month after RFA. Features of necrosis at CT, as mean entity, density and necrosis percentages compared to the original lesion, were evaluated and compared by using t-test with CA 19.9 blood levels variations after RFA procedure.

resultsIn this study were included 51 patients with diagnosis of unresectable and not metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, expressing tumor marker CA 19.9, treated with RFA procedure and with CT study and CA 19.9 available for analysis. After the procedure, CA 19.9 blood levels reduced in 24/51 (47%), remained stable in 10/51 (20%) and increased in 17/51 (33%). In patients with CA 19.9 levels reduced, the tumor marker were reduced less than 20% in 4/24 (17%) and more than 20% in 20/24 (83%); instead the tumor marker were reduced less than 30% in 8/24 (33%) and more than 30% in 16/24 (67%). At CT scan necrotic area density difference was not statistically significant. Also there was no statistically significant difference among the mean area, the mean volume and the mean ablation volume in percentage related to the treated tumor among the three different groups of patients divided depending on the CA 19.9 blood levels. But a tendency to a statistically significant difference was found in comparing the mean percentage of ablation volume between two subgroups of patients with a decrease of CA 19.9 levels with less or more than 20% reduction of tumor markers and between two subgroups with less or more than 30% reduction of CA 19.9 levels.

conclusionsRFA of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma induces reduction of CA 19.9 blood levels in about half of the cases.

Indexed as

pancreatic adenocarcinomapancreatic cancerRadiofrequency ablation (RFA)tumor marker

Identifiers

PMID27034788
PMCPMC4783756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.