Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27034661›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of telemedicine and applications2016

Towards mHealth Systems for Support of Psychotherapeutic Practice: A Qualitative Study of Researcher-Clinician Collaboration in System Design and Evaluation.

Karin Halje, Toomas Timpka, Joakim Ekberg, Magnus Bång, Anders Fröberg, Henrik Eriksson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of telemedicine and applications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karin HaljeYoung Adults Centre, Region Östergötland, 58185 Linköping, Sweden.
Toomas TimpkaDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden; Unit for Health Analysis, Centre for Healthcare Development, Region Östergötland, 58185 Linköping, Sweden; Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden.
Joakim EkbergDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden; Unit for Health Analysis, Centre for Healthcare Development, Region Östergötland, 58185 Linköping, Sweden.
Magnus BångDepartment of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden.
Anders FröbergDepartment of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden.
Henrik ErikssonDepartment of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined clinicians' and researchers' experiences from participation in collaborative research on the introduction of Internet and mobile information systems (mHealth systems) in psychotherapeutic routines. The study used grounded theory methodology and was set in a collaboration that aimed to develop and evaluate mHealth support of psychotherapy provided to young people. Soundness of the central objects developed in the design phase (the collaboration contract, the trial protocol, and the system technology) was a necessary foundation for successful collaborative mHealth research; neglect of unanticipated organizational influences during the trial phase was a factor in collaboration failure. The experiences gained in this study can be used in settings where collaborative research on mHealth systems in mental health is planned.

Identifiers

PMID27034661
PMCPMC4791500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.