Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27034443›Full record

ReviewBritish medical bulletin2016

The use of adjustable gastric bands for management of severe and complex obesity.

James C A Hopkins, Jane M Blazeby, Chris A Rogers, Richard Welbourn

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British medical bulletin, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02841527 (Gastric Bypass, Adjustable Gastric Banding or Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery to Treat Severe and Complex Obesity), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02841527 nacompletednot on this map

Gastric Bypass, Adjustable Gastric Banding or Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery to Treat Severe and Complex Obesity: a Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BristolRan2012 to 2023Enrolled1,351ConditionsObesity, Surgery, Quality of Life, Weight LossArmsGastric Band, Gastric Bypass, Sleeve Gastrectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James C A HopkinsDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery and Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton TA1 5DA, UK.
Jane M BlazebyCentre for Surgical Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Chris A RogersClinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Richard WelbournDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery and Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton TA1 5DA, UK Richard.welbourn@tst.nhs.uk.
Musgrove Park Hospital · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Department of Health 09/127/53
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity levels in the UK have reached a sustained high and ∼4% of the population would be candidates for bariatric surgery based upon current UK NICE guidelines, which has important implications for Clinical Commissioning Groups. SOURCES OF DATA: Summary data from Cochrane systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Currently, the only treatment that offers significant and durable weight loss for those with severe and complex obesity is surgery. Three operations account for 95% of all bariatric surgery in the UK, but the NHS offers surgery to only a small fraction of those who could benefit. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (gastric banding) has potentially the lowest risk and up-front costs of the three procedures. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Reliable Level 1 evidence of the relative effectiveness of the operations is lacking. GROWING POINTS: As a point intervention, weight loss surgery together with the chronic disease management strategy for obesity can prevent significant future disease and mortality, and the NHS should embrace both. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Better RCT evidence is needed including clinical effectiveness and economic analysis to answer the important question 'which is the best of the three operations most frequently performed?' This review considers the current evidence for gastric banding for the treatment of severe and complex obesity.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGastroplastyHumansMaleObesity, MorbidPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomWeight Lossbariatric surgerydiabetes treatmentgastric bandingmetabolic surgeryobesity surgery

Identifiers

PMID27034443
PMCPMC5127420
OpenAlexW2329280094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.