Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27034345›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2016

Identifying Key Drivers of the Impact of an HIV Cure Intervention in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Andrew N Phillips, Valentina Cambiano, Paul Revill, Fumiyo Nakagawa, Jens D Lundgren, Loveleen Bansi-Matharu, Travor Mabugu, Mark Sculpher, Geoff Garnett, Silvija Staprans and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Barriers to HIV remission research in low- and middle-income countries.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Andrew N PhillipsResearch Department of Infection & Population Health, UCL.
Valentina CambianoResearch Department of Infection & Population Health, UCL.
Paul RevillCentre for Health Economics, University of York, United Kingdom.
Fumiyo NakagawaResearch Department of Infection & Population Health, UCL.
Jens D LundgrenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Loveleen Bansi-MatharuResearch Department of Infection & Population Health, UCL.
Travor MabuguUniversity of Zimbabwe.
Mark SculpherCentre for Health Economics, University of York, United Kingdom.
Geoff GarnettBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington.
Silvija StapransBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington.
Stephen BeckerIndependent Consultant in HIV Global Health, Yountville, California.
Joseph MurunguMinistry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Sharon R LewinThe Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Steven G DeeksSan Francisco General Hospital Medical Center, California.
Timothy B HallettDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London.

Funding

Viral reservoirs and sanctuaries in HAART - treated patients: role and mechanismsU19AI096109 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SCHACKER, TIMOTHY W · 2011 to 2015
$29.5M
Medical Research Council MR/K010174/1NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI096109Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is unknown what properties would be required to make an intervention in low income countries that can eradicate or control human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) without antiretroviral therapy (ART) cost-effective.

methodsWe used a model of HIV and ART to investigate the effect of introducing an ART-free viral suppression intervention in 2022 using Zimbabwe as an example country. We assumed that the intervention (cost: $500) would be accessible for 90% of the population, be given to those receiving effective ART, have sufficient efficacy to allow ART interruption in 95%, with a rate of viral rebound of 5% per year in the first 3 months, and a 50% decline in rate with each successive year.

resultsAn ART-free viral suppression intervention with these properties would result in >0.53 million disability-adjusted-life-years averted over 2022-2042, with a reduction in HIV program costs of $300 million (8.7% saving). An intervention of this efficacy costing anything up to $1400 is likely to be cost-effective in this setting.

conclusionsInterventions aimed at curing HIV infection have the potential to improve overall disease burden and to reduce costs. Given the effectiveness and cost of ART, such interventions would have to be inexpensive and highly effective.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnti-HIV AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleForecastingHIV InfectionsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalPovertyYoung AdultZimbabweAnti-HIV Agentsantiretroviral therapycureeconomic evaluationHIVmodel

Identifiers

PMID27034345
PMCPMC4907418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.