ArticlePhotosynthesis research2016
Effect of light intensity and various organic acids on the growth of Rhodobacter sphaeroides LHII-deficient mutant in a turbidostat culture.
Article in Photosynthesis research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Relation between Structure and Functionality in Photosynthetic Antenna Complex of Green Sulfur Bacteria: Efficiency under Natural Sunlight Pumping.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The composition of photosynthetic apparatus of Rhodobacter sphaeroides wild strain 2.4.1 and its LHII-deficient mutant DBCΩ was compared. The absence of LHII in the mutant was confirmed by comparison of chromatophores spectra and by the absence of electrophoretic band corresponding to LHII complex. Continuous turbidostat cultures of wild strain and its LHII-deficient mutant were compared in response to different light intensities. Cultures were grown using lactate, mixture of lactate and acetate or succinate as carbon source. For comparative analysis, an approximation of experimental data by Monod and Gompertz equations were used. Cultures of DBCΩ had lower growth rates than wild strain when grown on lactate as electron donor and carbon source. Cultures of both strains grown on lactate and acetate or on succinate had similar growth rates. The cultures showed maximum growth rates when grown with succinate. Bacteriochlorophyll a content increased in both strains with decrease of incident light intensity. However, the variation of Bchl a content in wild strain was much more significant. Under light-limiting conditions, bacteriochlorophyll a content in DBCΩ was 4-5 times lower than in the wild strain. Under light-saturating conditions, it was only 1.5-2.5 times lower. Growing with lactate or with lactate and acetate, the mutant switched from light limitation under low light intensities to limitation by organic acids under higher light, whereas the parental strain had similar switch of limiting factor only when growing with lactate and acetate mixture. DBCΩ mutant has higher minimal light intensity enabling growth on any organic acid as a substrate. When growing with lactate or with lactate and acetate, the mutant reached maximum growth rate at lower light intensities than the wild strain. This phenomenon was observed for the first time. Taking into account the concentration of BChl a under light-limiting conditions, the thickness of the suspension capable of effective light absorption could be increased by 4-5 times, which is favorable for intensive cultivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27034065What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.