Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27033961›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2016

A multicenter randomised, 1-year comparative effectiveness, parallel-group trial protocol of a physical therapy approach compared to corticosteroid injection on pain and function related to knee osteoarthritis (PTA Trial)

Gail D Deyle, Norman W Gill, Daniel I Rhon, Chris S Allen, Stephen C Allison, Ben R Hando, Evan J Petersen, Douglas I Dusenberry, Nicholas Bellamy

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01427153 (Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy Versus Corticosteroid Injections for Osteoarthritis of the Knee), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01427153 nacompletednot on this map

Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy Versus Corticosteroid Injections for Osteoarthritis of the Knee

TypeinterventionalSponsorMadigan Army Medical CenterRan2012 to 2019Enrolled156ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsOrthopaedic manual physical therapy, Corticosteroid Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Gail D DeyleBrooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Norman W GillBrooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Daniel I RhonMadigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington, USA.
Chris S AllenBrooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Stephen C AllisonBrooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Ben R HandoNational Defense University, Washington, DC, USA.
Evan J PetersenUniversity of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Douglas I DusenberryBrooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Nicholas BellamyUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Wilford Hall Medical Center · USSan Antonio Military Medical Center · USMadigan Army Medical Center · USNational Defense University · USUniversity of Queensland · AUUniversity of the Incarnate Word · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCorticosteroid injections (CSIs) are commonly used as an initial or a primary intervention for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Consistent evidence indicates CSIs offer symptom relief with conflicting reports regarding long-term efficacy. Physical therapy (PT) offers a non-invasive alternative. There is moderate evidence suggesting short-term and long-term symptom relief and functional improvement with PT interventions. Patients with knee OA are more commonly prescribed CSI than PT prior to total joint replacement. UnitedHealthcare and Military Health System data show substantially more total knee replacement patients receive preoperative CSI than PT. There are no studies comparing CSI to a PT approach in individuals with knee OA. The primary objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of CSI to PT in individuals with knee OA at 1, 2 and 12 months. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We plan to recruit 156 participants meeting established knee OA criteria. Following informed consent, participants will be randomised to receive either CSI or PT. All participants will receive instruction on recommended exercise and weight control strategies plus usual medical care. The CSI intervention consisting of 3 injections and the PT intervention consisting of 8-12 sessions will be spaced over 12 months. Measures of the dependent variables (DVs) will occur at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post enrolment. This pragmatic, randomised clinical trial will be a mixed-model 2×5 factorial design. The independent variables are treatment (CSI and PT) and time with five levels from baseline to 1 year. The primary DV is the Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). We will also compare healthcare utilisation between the 2 groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Madigan Army Medical Center Institutional Review Board. The authors intend to publish the results in a peer-reviewed source. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01427153.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesResearch DesignAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisability EvaluationDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInjectionsMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePainPain ManagementAdrenal Cortex HormonesREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID27033961
PMCPMC4823390
OpenAlexW2315818499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.