ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2016
Assessment of a needle-tracking system for bipolar radiofrequency ablation.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of ultrasonography.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and efficacy of a needle-tracking system in phantom and clinical studies using bipolar electrodes.
methodsTo observe the tip of the electrode, a needle-tracking system with a volume navigation system was used. In the phantom study, the electrode was inserted at various angles and the error was verified. In the clinical study, 21 nodules close to extrahepatic organs or major vessels were enrolled between May and October 2014. After puncturing with the needle-tracking system, computed tomography (CT) was performed. The distances between the electrode tip and extrahepatic organs or major vessels were measured on both B-mode ultrasound (US) and CT. By comparing these distances, the accuracy of this system was evaluated.
resultsIn the phantom study, the deviation between the tip of the electrode and the virtual tip of the electrode was analyzed. The median values were within 2 mm at each puncture angle. In the clinical study, the difference between B-mode US and CT was less (mean value 1.17 ± 1.76 mm; range 0-3.5 mm).
conclusionThe needle-tracking system is an accurate and useful system for bipolar radiofrequency ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.