Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27033854›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2016

A scoping review of perineural steroids for the treatment of chronic postoperative inguinal pain.

J S Khan, A Rai, R Sundara Rajan, T D Jackson, A Bhatia

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Ilioinguinal Neuropathy.Current pain and headache reports · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

J S KhanDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst Street, McL 2-405, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada.
A RaiWayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America.
R Sundara RajanDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
T D JacksonDepartment of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
A BhatiaDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst Street, McL 2-405, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada. anuj.bhatia@uhn.ca.
University of Toronto · CAMichigan United · USRoyal Stoke University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo review the literature on the efficacy and safety of perineural steroid injections around the ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genitofemoral nerves for chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP).

methodsA scoping review was performed to find all relevant case reports, case series, prospective or retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) where a steroid was used for perineural procedures around ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and/or genitofemoral nerves for CPIP. Databases searched included Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar.

resultsA total of five publications were found-three studies were prospective case series, one a retrospective cohort study, and one a RCT. The most common steroids used were methylprednisolone and triamcinolone. The average methylprednisolone-equivalent dose used per procedure was 46 mg (SD 21.9). Procedural guidance included anatomic landmarks (three studies), nerve stimulation and ultrasound (one study), and computed tomography guidance (one study). Four studies reported analgesic benefit in 55-75 % of included patients, with one study documenting an effect up to 50 months later after steroid perineural injections. The RCT demonstrated no benefit of adding steroid to a local anesthetic in the perioperative setting but it did not enroll patients with existing neuropathic pain. No adverse outcomes of perineural steroids were documented within reviewed studies.

conclusionsThe paucity of data, heterogeneity and lack of appropriate control groups in the available literature precludes firm conclusions on the efficacy and safety of perineural steroids for CPIP. Future adequately powered, high-quality, placebo-controlled studies are needed.

Indexed as

Chronic PainGlucocorticoidsGroinHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyHumansNerve BlockNeuralgiaPostoperative PainGlucocorticoidsInguinal herniaNerve blockPainSteroids

Identifiers

PMID27033854
OpenAlexW2320453210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.