Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27033720›Full record

ArticleOecologia2016

Spatial variation in senescence rates in a bird metapopulation.

H Holand, T Kvalnes, M Gamelon, J Tufto, H Jensen, H Pärn, T H Ringsby, B-E Sæther

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular evolution of animal aging.The EMBO journal · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Consistent scaling of inbreeding depression in space and time in a house sparrow metapopulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H HolandDepartment of Biology, Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491, Trondheim, Norway. hakon.holand@ntnu.no.
T KvalnesDepartment of Biology, Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
M GamelonDepartment of Biology, Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
J TuftoDepartment of Mathematics, Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
H JensenDepartment of Biology, Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
H PärnDepartment of Biology, Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
T H RingsbyDepartment of Biology, Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
B-E SætherDepartment of Biology, Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NONorwegian Biodiversity Information Centre · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigating factors which affect the decline in survival with age, i.e. actuarial senescence, is important in order to understand how demographic rates vary in wild populations. Although the evidence for the occurrence of actuarial senescence in wild populations is growing, very few studies have compared actuarial senescence rates between wild populations of the same species. We used data from a long-time study of demography of house sparrows (Passer domesticus) to investigate differences in rates of actuarial senescence between habitats and sub-populations. We also investigated whether rates of actuarial senescence differed between males and females. We found that rates of actuarial senescence showed large spatial variation. We also found that the onset of actuarial senescence varied between sub-populations. However, these differences were not significantly explained by a general difference in habitat type. We also found no significant difference in actuarial senescence rates between males and females. This study shows that senescence rates in natural populations may vary significantly between sub-populations and that failing to account for such differences may give a biased estimate of senescence rates of a species.

Indexed as

DemographySparrowsAnimalsEcosystemAgeingHouse sparrowMetapopulationSenescenceSpatial

Identifiers

PMID27033720
OpenAlexW2317819798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.