Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27033692›Full record

ArticlePituitary2016

General health status and intelligence scores of children of mothers with acromegaly do not differ from those of healthy mothers.

Ozlem Haliloglu, Burak Dogangun, Bahar Ozcabi, Hanife Ugur Kural, Fatma Ela Keskin, Hande Mefkure Ozkaya, Fatma Colkesen Pamukcu, Elif Bektas, Burc Cagri Poyraz, Hakan Buber and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Approach of Acromegaly during Pregnancy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ozlem HalilogluDivision of Endocrinology-Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Burak DogangunDepartment of Pediatric Psychiatry, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bahar OzcabiDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hanife Ugur KuralDepartment of Pediatric Psychiatry, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fatma Ela KeskinDivision of Endocrinology-Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hande Mefkure OzkayaDivision of Endocrinology-Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fatma Colkesen PamukcuDepartment of Pediatric Psychiatry, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Elif BektasDepartment of Pediatric Psychiatry, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Burc Cagri PoyrazDepartment of Psychiatry, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hakan BuberDivision of Endocrinology-Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Olcay EvliyaogluDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Pinar KadiogluDivision of Endocrinology-Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. kadioglup@yahoo.com.
Istanbul University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the physical status and intelligence scores of children of acromegalic mothers and to compare them with those of children from mothers without acromegaly.

methodsSix women with acromegaly who became pregnant under follow-up between 2010 and 2014 and their 16 children (group A) were assessed and compared with 16 children of healthy women (group B) and 15 children of women with prolactinoma (group C). The physical examinations of children were performed by the department of pediatric endocrinology and intelligence quotient (IQ) testing was undertaken by adult and pediatric psychiatry departments, using appropriate scales for their ages.

resultsSix of the 16 children (girls/boys: 7/9) were born after the diagnosis of acromegaly. Five of the 6 pregnancies occured when the patients were taking somatostatin analogs, none continued taking the drugs during pregnancy. The mean IQ of groups A, B, and C were 106.4 ± 12.5, 105.3 ± 12.5, and 103.2 ± 16.1 respectively (p > 0.05). The mean ages, birth percentiles, recent weight and height standard deviation scores were similar between groups (p > 0.05). Two siblings from group A and 1 child from group B were large for gestational age at birth. At recent follow-up, two children from group A were found tall for their age and one from group C was short for his age and was placed under the care of pediatric endocrinology clinic.

conclusionsPregnancies in acromegaly seems to be uneventful and the general health status and IQ scores of children from women with and without acromegaly were found similar.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFetal MacrosomiaGrowth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary AdenomaHealth StatusHumansHypoglycemiaInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesIntelligenceIntelligence TestsAcromegalyChildrenIntelligence quotientPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID27033692
OpenAlexW2333027435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.