Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27033409›Full record

Observational studyEpidemiology and infection2016

What is the utility of using syndromic surveillance systems during large subnational infectious gastrointestinal disease outbreaks? An observational study using case studies from the past 5 years in England.

D Todkill, A J Elliot, R Morbey, J Harris, J Hawker, O Edeghere, G E Smith

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Epidemiology and infection, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluating multi-purpose syndromic surveillance systems - a complex problem.Online journal of public health informatics · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

D TodkillPublic Health England,Real-time Syndromic Surveillance Team,National Infection Service,Birmingham,UK.
A J ElliotPublic Health England,Real-time Syndromic Surveillance Team,National Infection Service,Birmingham,UK.
R MorbeyPublic Health England,Real-time Syndromic Surveillance Team,National Infection Service,Birmingham,UK.
J HarrisPublic Health England,Gastrointestinal Emerging and Zoonotic Infections,National Infection Service,Colindale,London,UK.
J HawkerPublic Health England,Field Epidemiology Service,National Infection Service,Birmingham,UK.
O EdegherePublic Health England,Field Epidemiology Service,National Infection Service,Birmingham,UK.
G E SmithPublic Health England,Real-time Syndromic Surveillance Team,National Infection Service,Birmingham,UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Syndromic surveillance systems in England have demonstrated utility in the early identification of seasonal gastrointestinal illness (GI) tracking its spatio-temporal distribution and enabling early public health action. There would be additional public health utility if syndromic surveillance systems could detect or track subnational infectious disease outbreaks. To investigate using syndromic surveillance for this purpose we retrospectively identified eight large GI outbreaks between 2009 and 2014 (four randomly and four purposively sampled). We then examined syndromic surveillance information prospectively collected by the Real-time Syndromic Surveillance team within Public Health England for evidence of possible outbreak-related changes. None of the outbreaks were identified contemporaneously and no alerts were made to relevant public health teams. Retrospectively, two of the outbreaks - which happened at similar times and in proximal geographical locations - demonstrated changes in the local trends of relevant syndromic indicators and exhibited a clustering of statistical alarms, but did not warrant alerting local health protection teams. Our suite of syndromic surveillance systems may be more suited to their original purposes than as means of detecting or monitoring localized, subnational GI outbreaks. This should, however, be considered in the context of this study's limitations; further prospective work is needed to fully explore the use of syndromic surveillance for this purpose. Provided geographical coverage is sufficient, syndromic surveillance systems could be able to provide reassurance of no or minor excess healthcare systems usage during localized GI incidents.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksPopulation SurveillanceEnglandGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansPublic HealthRetrospective StudiesGastrointestinal infectionsoutbreakssurveillancesurveillance system

Identifiers

PMID27033409
PMCPMC9150522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.