ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2016
A Two-Criterion Model for Microvascular Bio-Effects Induced In Vivo by Contrast Microbubbles Exposed to Medical Ultrasound.
Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perspective on ultrasound bioeffects and possible implications for continuous post-dive monitoring safety.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2022Review
- Histological and blood chemistry examination of the rodent kidney after exposure to flash-replenishment ultrasound contrast imaging.Ultrasonics · 2019Article
- Capillary Hemorrhage Induced by Contrast-Enhanced Diagnostic Ultrasound in Rat Intestine.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2019Article
- Influence of Microbubble Size and Pulse Amplitude on Hepatocyte Injury Induced by Contrast-Enhanced Diagnostic Ultrasound.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2019Article
- The Dependence of Glomerular Capillary Hemorrhage Induced by Contrast Enhanced Diagnostic Ultrasound on Microbubble Diameter.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanical index (MI) is a theoretical exposure parameter for cavitational bio-effects of diagnostic ultrasound. The theory for the MI assumed that bubbles of all relevant sizes exist in tissue, a condition that is approximated for tissues that include a microbubble contrast agent. Therefore, the MI should allow science-based safety guidance for contrast-enhanced diagnostic ultrasound. However, theoretical predictions of bio-effects thresholds based on the MI typically do not concur with the frequency dependence of experimentally measured thresholds for bio-effects. For example, experimental thresholds for glomerular capillary hemorrhage in rats infused with contrast microbubbles increased approximately linearly with frequency, whereas the MI predicted a square root dependence. Here, cavitation thresholds were computed for linear versions of the acoustic pulses used in that study assuming bubbles containing either air, C3F8, or a 1:1 mixture of the two and surrounded by either blood or kidney tissue. Although no single threshold criterion was successful, combining results for one criterion that maximized circumferential stress in the capillary wall with another that ensured an inertial collapse produced thresholds that were consistent with experimental data. This suggests that a contrast-specific safety metric may be achieved following validation of this two-criterion model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.