Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27032870›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2016

Best Practices in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Monitoring and Management.

Simona Soverini, Caterina De Benedittis, Manuela Mancini, Giovanni Martinelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The molecular management of classic myeloproliferative neoplasm.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The role of Fbxo5 in the development of human malignant tumors.American journal of cancer research · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simona SoveriniDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Hematology/Oncology "L. e A. Seràgnoli," University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy simona.soverini@unibo.it.
Caterina De BenedittisDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Hematology/Oncology "L. e A. Seràgnoli," University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Manuela ManciniDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Hematology/Oncology "L. e A. Seràgnoli," University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giovanni MartinelliDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Hematology/Oncology "L. e A. Seràgnoli," University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelled: Optimal use of current therapeutic opportunities for chronic myeloid leukemia patients requires integration of clinical and laboratory monitoring. Assessment of molecular response (MR) by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction is the most sensitive way to monitor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment efficacy. Besides major molecular response, which has emerged as a safe haven for survival since the initial studies of first-line imatinib treatment, two additional MR milestones have recently been defined: early molecular response and deep molecular response. The achievement of such MR milestones within defined time points during therapy is thought to draw the ideal trajectory toward optimal long-term outcome and, possibly, successful treatment discontinuation. Sensitive and reproducible MR measurement and proper interpretation of MR results are therefore critical to correctly inform therapeutic decisions. In patients who do not achieve an optimal response to TKI therapy, BCR-ABL1 mutation screening should also be performed, because it may deliver useful information for TKI choice. This review aims to help clinicians apply and translate the latest response definitions and clinical recommendations into practice. We provide a critical update on how these recommendations have incorporated MR levels in the clinical decision algorithms and how detection of BCR-ABL1 mutations should be interpreted. We also include a practical guide for pathologists and molecular biologists to best perform molecular testing and for hematologists and oncologists to best integrate it into routine practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Ever-more-potent therapeutic strategies have been developed for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in parallel with the evolution of therapeutic goals and the refinement of response definitions and monitoring schemes and procedures. Terminology and methodology continue to evolve rapidly, making it difficult for busy hematology/oncology professionals to keep abreast of the newest developments. Optimal CML patient management results from the timely and rational use of molecular testing, the critical assessment of the power and pitfalls of current technology, and the appropriate interpretation and contextualization of results.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmGenes, ablHumansLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Kinase InhibitorsBCR-ABL1Leukemia, chronic myeloidMinimal residual diseaseMolecular testingTyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID27032870
PMCPMC4861357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.