ReviewThe oncologist2016
Best Practices in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Monitoring and Management.
Review in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of the Number and Phenotype of Macrophages in the Human BMB Samples of CML.BioMed research international · 2016Trial
- The molecular management of classic myeloproliferative neoplasm.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2025Review
- Targeted therapies induced depigmentation: a review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- [The clinical potential of measurable residual disease in hematological malignancies].Magyar onkologia · 2024Review
- Leukemia in pregnancy: Diagnosis and therapeutic approach (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Validation of a novel NGS based BCR::ABL1 kinase domain mutation detection assay in Indian cohort.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Combination of an aurora kinase inhibitor and the ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor asciminib against ABL inhibitor-resistant CML cells.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024Article
- "Combination treatments of imatinib with astaxanthin and crocin efficiently ameliorate antioxidant status, inflammation and cell death progression in imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia cells".Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
- Article
- The role of Fbxo5 in the development of human malignant tumors.American journal of cancer research · 2022Review
- Overcoming Resistance to Kinase Inhibitors: The Paradigm of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.OncoTargets and therapy · 2022Review
- Targeting Leukemic Stem Cells in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Is It Worth the Effort?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Predictive value of tyrosine phosphatase receptor gamma for the response to treatment tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia patients.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Higher Red Blood Cell Distribution Width is a Poor Prognostic Factor for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Leukemia in the Lymphoid Lineage-Similarities and Differences with the Myeloid Lineage and Specific Vulnerabilities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Mutations in the BCR-ABL1 kinase domain in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia treated with TKIs or at diagnosis.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- A Novel Methoxybenzyl 5-Nitroacridone Derivative Effectively Triggers G1 Cell Cycle Arrest in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia K562 Cells by Inhibiting CDK4/6-Mediated Phosphorylation of Rb.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Expert opinion-management of chronic myeloid leukemia after resistance to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors.Leukemia · 2020Review
- Statistics and measurable residual disease (MRD) testing: uses and abuses in hematopoietic cell transplantation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2020Article
- Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Recent Advances.Cancer management and research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelled: Optimal use of current therapeutic opportunities for chronic myeloid leukemia patients requires integration of clinical and laboratory monitoring. Assessment of molecular response (MR) by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction is the most sensitive way to monitor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment efficacy. Besides major molecular response, which has emerged as a safe haven for survival since the initial studies of first-line imatinib treatment, two additional MR milestones have recently been defined: early molecular response and deep molecular response. The achievement of such MR milestones within defined time points during therapy is thought to draw the ideal trajectory toward optimal long-term outcome and, possibly, successful treatment discontinuation. Sensitive and reproducible MR measurement and proper interpretation of MR results are therefore critical to correctly inform therapeutic decisions. In patients who do not achieve an optimal response to TKI therapy, BCR-ABL1 mutation screening should also be performed, because it may deliver useful information for TKI choice. This review aims to help clinicians apply and translate the latest response definitions and clinical recommendations into practice. We provide a critical update on how these recommendations have incorporated MR levels in the clinical decision algorithms and how detection of BCR-ABL1 mutations should be interpreted. We also include a practical guide for pathologists and molecular biologists to best perform molecular testing and for hematologists and oncologists to best integrate it into routine practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Ever-more-potent therapeutic strategies have been developed for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in parallel with the evolution of therapeutic goals and the refinement of response definitions and monitoring schemes and procedures. Terminology and methodology continue to evolve rapidly, making it difficult for busy hematology/oncology professionals to keep abreast of the newest developments. Optimal CML patient management results from the timely and rational use of molecular testing, the critical assessment of the power and pitfalls of current technology, and the appropriate interpretation and contextualization of results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.