Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27032838›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Effect of alternating bioremediation and electrokinetics on the remediation of n-hexadecane-contaminated soil.

Sa Wang, Shuhai Guo, Fengmei Li, Xuelian Yang, Fei Teng, Jianing Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Alternating current enhanced bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soils.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sa WangInstitute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.
Shuhai GuoInstitute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.
Fengmei LiInstitute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.
Xuelian YangShenyang University, Shenyang 110014, China.
Fei TengShenyang University, Shenyang 110014, China.
Jianing WangInstitute of Biology, Shandong Academy of Sciences, Jinan 250014, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study demonstrated the highly efficient degradation of n-hexadecane in soil, realized by alternating bioremediation and electrokinetic technologies. Using an alternating technology instead of simultaneous application prevented competition between the processes that would lower their efficiency. For the consumption of the soil dissolved organic matter (DOM) necessary for bioremediation by electrokinetics, bioremediation was performed first. Because of the utilization and loss of the DOM and water-soluble ions by the microbial and electrokinetic processes, respectively, both of them were supplemented to provide a basic carbon resource, maintain a high electrical conductivity and produce a uniform distribution of ions. The moisture and bacteria were also supplemented. The optimal DOM supplement (20.5 mg·kg(-1) glucose; 80-90% of the total natural DOM content in the soil) was calculated to avoid competitive effects (between the DOM and n-hexadecane) and to prevent nutritional deficiency. The replenishment of the water-soluble ions maintained their content equal to their initial concentrations. The degradation rate of n-hexadecane was only 167.0 mg·kg(-1)·d(-1) (1.9%, w/w) for the first 9 days in the treatments with bioremediation or electrokinetics alone, but this rate was realized throughout the whole process when the two technologies were alternated, with a degradation of 78.5% ± 2.0% for the n-hexadecane after 45 days of treatment.

Indexed as

AlkanesElectrophoresisSoil MicrobiologySoil PollutantsBacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiomassCarbonChinaHumic SubstancesAlkanesCarbonHumic Substancesn-hexadecaneSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID27032838
PMCPMC4817206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.