Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27032719›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2016

Barriers to Adoption of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Patients With Heart Failure: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Sandesh Dev, Trisha K Hoffman, Dio Kavalieratos, Paul Heidenreich, Wen-Chih Wu, Dawn C Schwenke, Sarah J Tracy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sandesh DevCardiology Section, Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ sandesh.dev@va.gov.
Trisha K HoffmanHugh Downs School of Human Communication, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
Dio KavalieratosSection of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Paul HeidenreichCardiology Section, Palo Alto VA Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA.
Wen-Chih WuCardiology Section, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI.
Dawn C SchwenkeResearch Section, Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ.
Sarah J TracyHugh Downs School of Human Communication, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
Arizona State University · USPhoenix VA Health Care System · USPalo Alto Veterans Institute for Research · USProvidence VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Scholars ProgramK12HS022989 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KAPOOR, WISHWA N · 2014 to 2018
$3.9M
INTEGRATING PALLIATIVE CARE WITH DISEASE MANAGEMENT TO IMPROVE OUTCOMES AMONG PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED HEART FAILURE: INTERVENTIONAL RESEARCH CAREER DEVELOPMENTK01HL133466 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KAVALIERATOS, DIONYSIOS · 2016 to 2019
$527k
AHRQ HHS K12 HS022989AHRQ HHS K12HS022989NCATS NIH HHS L30 TR001226NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL133466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are the most underutilized pharmacotherapy for heart failure. Minimal data are available on the barriers to MRA adoption from the perspective of prescribing clinicians. METHODS AND

resultsA mixed-methods study consisting of a survey (n=50), focus groups (n=39), interviews (n=6) with clinicians at a single US Department of Veterans Affairs medical center served to ascertain barriers to optimal use of MRAs. Participants were drawn from 6 groups: cardiology providers, cardiology fellows, hospitalists, clinical pharmacists, internal medicine residents, and primary care providers. Qualitative data were iteratively coded with qualitative data analysis software. The survey response rate was 17.3%. Overall, 51% of survey respondents were unfamiliar with eplerenone, and 6% were unfamiliar with spironolactone. In addition, 30% of respondents reported that they would order a laboratory test >2 weeks after a new MRA prescription, although that is beyond the guideline recommendation. Most providers correctly identified New York Heart Association class 3 and 4 patients as MRA eligible, but only 42% identified class 2 patients as MRA eligible. Through analysis of focus groups, we identified 8 barriers to MRA use in 3 categories: patient-based barriers (concerns about polypharmacy and comorbidities, adverse effects, perceived patient nonadherence), provider-based barriers (unclear roles and responsibilities, coordination and transitions of care, lack of experience or familiarity with MRAs), and system-based barriers (system overload and provider time constraints, lack of systematic follow-up procedures).

conclusionsEight primary barriers to MRA adoption at the provider, patient, and health system levels were identified from the prescriber perspective. These barriers can inform the creation of multilevel interventions that will be required to close the gap in MRA adoption.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'Clinical CompetenceComorbidityDrug PrescriptionsDrug Utilization ReviewFocus GroupsGuideline AdherenceHealth Care SurveysHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHeart FailureHumansInterviews as TopicMedication AdherenceMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsPolypharmacyPractice Guidelines as TopicMineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonistsqualitative researchquality of carespironolactone

Identifiers

PMID27032719
PMCPMC4943238
OpenAlexW2313172434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.