ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2016
Barriers to Adoption of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Patients With Heart Failure: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacist- and Nurse-Led Medical Optimization in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of cardiac failure · 2023Pooled it
- NR3C2 genotype is associated with response to spironolactone in diastolic heart failure patients from the Aldo-DHF trial.Pharmacotherapy · 2021Trial
- Etiology, Management, and Outcomes of Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients:Saudi medical journal · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in an Integrated Health System and Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Thematic Qualitative Analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Qualitative Analysis of Patient Decisional Needs for Medications to Treat Heart Failure.Circulation. Heart failure · 2024Article
- Clinician challenges to evidence-based prescribing for heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: A qualitative evaluation.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2023Article
- Sustained Effect of Clinical Decision Support for Heart Failure: A Natural Experiment Using Implementation Science.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Article
- Clinician Adherence to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Guidelines: Results of a Qualitative Study of Barriers and Enablers.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2023Article
- Managing patients with heart failure: contemporary real-world experience.BMC research notes · 2022Article
- Bias in natriuretic peptide-guided heart failure trials: time to improve guideline adherence using alternative approaches.Heart failure reviews · 2021Review
- The Utilization of Spironolactone in Heart Failure Patients at a Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2020Article
- Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use after hospitalization of patients with heart failure and post-discharge outcomes: a single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2019Observational
- Safety and Tolerability of Initiating Maximum-Dose Sacubitril-Valsartan in Patients on Target Dose Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2019Article
- Obstacles to mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in a community-based heart failure population.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2018Article
- "We're Almost Guests in Their Clinical Care": Inpatient Provider Attitudes Toward Chronic Disease Management.Journal of hospital medicine · 2017Article
- Barriers to Adoption of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Patients With Heart Failure: A Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2016Article
- The selective mineralocorticoid receptor modulator AZD9977 reveals differences in mineralocorticoid effects of aldosterone and fludrocortisone.Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAASArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are the most underutilized pharmacotherapy for heart failure. Minimal data are available on the barriers to MRA adoption from the perspective of prescribing clinicians. METHODS AND
resultsA mixed-methods study consisting of a survey (n=50), focus groups (n=39), interviews (n=6) with clinicians at a single US Department of Veterans Affairs medical center served to ascertain barriers to optimal use of MRAs. Participants were drawn from 6 groups: cardiology providers, cardiology fellows, hospitalists, clinical pharmacists, internal medicine residents, and primary care providers. Qualitative data were iteratively coded with qualitative data analysis software. The survey response rate was 17.3%. Overall, 51% of survey respondents were unfamiliar with eplerenone, and 6% were unfamiliar with spironolactone. In addition, 30% of respondents reported that they would order a laboratory test >2 weeks after a new MRA prescription, although that is beyond the guideline recommendation. Most providers correctly identified New York Heart Association class 3 and 4 patients as MRA eligible, but only 42% identified class 2 patients as MRA eligible. Through analysis of focus groups, we identified 8 barriers to MRA use in 3 categories: patient-based barriers (concerns about polypharmacy and comorbidities, adverse effects, perceived patient nonadherence), provider-based barriers (unclear roles and responsibilities, coordination and transitions of care, lack of experience or familiarity with MRAs), and system-based barriers (system overload and provider time constraints, lack of systematic follow-up procedures).
conclusionsEight primary barriers to MRA adoption at the provider, patient, and health system levels were identified from the prescriber perspective. These barriers can inform the creation of multilevel interventions that will be required to close the gap in MRA adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.