Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27031953›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Evaluation of the Bladder Stimulation Technique to Collect Midstream Urine in Infants in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

Antoine Tran, Clara Fortier, Lisa Giovannini-Chami, Diane Demonchy, Hervé Caci, Jonathan Desmontils, Isabelle Montaudie-Dumas, Ronny Bensaïd, Hervé Haas, Etienne Berard

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05394454 (The Effect of Non-invasive Bladder Stimulation Technique on Collecting Urine Specimen in Infants Under One Year Old), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05394454 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Non-invasive Bladder Stimulation Technique on Collecting Urine Specimen in Infants Under One Year Old: Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul University - CerrahpasaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled64ConditionsUrine Specimen CollectionArmsBladder stimulation technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Reducing infant catheterization in the emergency department through clean-catch urine collection.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Antoine TranHôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-Lenval, Nice, France.
Clara FortierHôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-Lenval, Nice, France.
Lisa Giovannini-ChamiHôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-Lenval, Nice, France.
Diane DemonchyHôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-Lenval, Nice, France.
Hervé CaciHôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-Lenval, Nice, France.
Jonathan DesmontilsHôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-Lenval, Nice, France.
Isabelle Montaudie-DumasHôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-Lenval, Nice, France.
Ronny BensaïdHôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-Lenval, Nice, France.
Hervé HaasHôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice CHU-Lenval, Nice, France.
Etienne BerardService de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, CHU de Nice, Archet 2, Nice, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMidstream clean-catch urine is an accepted method to diagnose urinary tract infection but is impracticable in infants before potty training. We tested the bladder stimulation technique to obtain a clean-catch urine sample in infants. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe included 142 infants under walking age who required a urine sample in a cross-sectional study carried out during a 3-months period, from September to November 2014, in the emergency department of the University Children's Hospital of Nice (France). A technique based on bladder stimulation and lumbar stimulation maneuvers, with at least two attempts, was tested by four trained physicians. The success rate and time to obtain urine sample within 3 minutes were evaluated. Discomfort (EVENDOL score ≥4/15) was measured. We estimated the risk factors in the failure of the technique. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test were used to compare frequencies. T-test and Wilcoxon test were used to compare quantitative data according to the normality of the distribution. Risk factors for failure of the technique were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model.

resultsWe obtained midstream clean-catch urine in 55.6% of infants with a median time of 52.0 s (10.0; 110.0). The success rate decreased with age from 88.9% (newborn) to 28.6% (>1 y) (p = 0.0001) and with weight, from 85.7% (<4 kg) to 28.6% (>10 kg) (p = 0.0004). The success rate was 60.8% for infants without discomfort (p<0.0001). Heavy weight and discomfort were associated with failure, with adjusted ORs of 1.47 [1.04-2.31] and 6.65 [2.85-15.54], respectively.

conclusionBladder stimulation seems to be efficient in obtaining midstream urine with a moderate success rate in our study sample. This could be an alternative technique for infants before potty training but further randomized multicenter studies are needed to validate this procedure.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFranceHospitals, PediatricHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleOdds RatioRisk FactorsUrinary BladderUrinary Tract InfectionsUrine Specimen Collection

Identifiers

PMID27031953
PMCPMC4816310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.