Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27031869›Full record

SynthesisPopulation health management2017

Leveraging Health-Related Quality of Life in Population Health Management: The Case for Healthy Days.

S Lane Slabaugh, Mona Shah, Matthew Zack, Laura Happe, Tristan Cordier, Eric Havens, Evan Davidson, Michael Miao, Todd Prewitt, Haomiao Jia

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Population health management, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effects of Childcare, Work, and Caregiving Intensity on Male and Female Family Caregivers.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life Among African American Men.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

S Lane Slabaugh1 Humana Inc. , Louisville, Kentucky.
Mona Shah2 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation , Princeton, New Jersey.
Matthew Zack3 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia .
Laura Happe1 Humana Inc. , Louisville, Kentucky.
Tristan Cordier1 Humana Inc. , Louisville, Kentucky.
Eric Havens1 Humana Inc. , Louisville, Kentucky.
Evan Davidson1 Humana Inc. , Louisville, Kentucky.
Michael Miao1 Humana Inc. , Louisville, Kentucky.
Todd Prewitt1 Humana Inc. , Louisville, Kentucky.
Haomiao Jia4 Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University , New York, New York.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring population health with morbidity and mortality data, often collected at the site of care, fails to capture the individual's perspective on health and well-being. Because health happens outside the walls of medical facilities, a holistic and singular measure of health that can easily be captured for an entire population could aid in understanding the well-being of communities. This paper postulates that Healthy Days, a health-related quality of life measure developed and validated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, is an ideal survey instrument to advance population health. A systematic literature review was conducted and revealed a strong evidence base using Healthy Days with significant correlations to chronic disease conditions. Building on the literature base and experience, methods for analyzing Healthy Days data are discussed, including stratified sampling techniques, statistical measures to account for variance, and modeling techniques for skewed distributions. Using such analytic techniques, Healthy Days has been used extensively in national health surveillance. As the health care system faces increasing costs and constrained resources, the Healthy Days survey instrument can be used to inform public policies and allocate health service resources. Because Healthy Days captures broad dimensions of health from the individual's perspective, it is a simple way to holistically measure the health and well-being of a population and its trend over time. Expanded use of Healthy Days can aid population health managers and contribute to the understanding of the broader determinants of the nation's and individual community's health and aid in evaluating progress toward health goals.

Indexed as

Population HealthQuality of LifeBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMalePublic PolicyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27031869
PMCPMC5278802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.