Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27031848›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of cancer2016

Correlations of survival with progression-free survival, response rate, and disease control rate in advanced biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised trials of first-line chemotherapy.

Toshikazu Moriwaki, Yoshiyuki Yamamoto, Masahiko Gosho, Mariko Kobayashi, Akinori Sugaya, Takeshi Yamada, Shinji Endo, Ichinosuke Hyodo

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Exploring Heterogeneity in Histology-Independent Technologies and the Implications for Cost-Effectiveness.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Toshikazu MoriwakiFaculty of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.
Yoshiyuki YamamotoFaculty of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.
Masahiko GoshoFaculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Trial and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.
Mariko KobayashiFaculty of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.
Akinori SugayaFaculty of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.
Takeshi YamadaFaculty of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.
Shinji EndoFaculty of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.
Ichinosuke HyodoFaculty of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.
University of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe need to promote novel drug development for advanced biliary tract cancer (ABTC) has emphasised the importance of determining whether various efficacy end points can act as surrogates for overall survival (OS).

methodsWe conducted a literature search of randomised trials of first-line chemotherapy for ABTC and investigated correlations between efficacy end points and OS using weighted linear regression analysis. The ratios of the median OS, median progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, and disease control rate in each trial were used to summarise treatment effects. The surrogate threshold effect (STE), which was the minimum treatment effect on PFS required to predict a non-zero treatment effect on OS, was calculated.

resultsSeventeen randomised trials with 36 treatment arms were identified, and a sample size of 2148 patients with 19 paired arms was analysed. The strongest correlation between all evaluated efficacy end points was observed between median OS and median PFS ratios (r(2)=0.66). In trials with gemcitabine-containing therapies and targeted agents, the r(2)-values were 0.78. The STE was estimated at 0.83 for all trials and 0.81 for trials with gemcitabine-containing therapies, and was not calculated for trials with targeted agents.

conclusionsThe median PFS ratio correlated well with the median OS ratio, and may be useful for planning a clinical trial for novel drug development.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiliary Tract NeoplasmsDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionGemcitabineHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeDeoxycytidineGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID27031848
PMCPMC4984805
OpenAlexW2312265484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.