SynthesisPloS one2016
Assessing Communication Skills of Medical Students in Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE)--A Systematic Review of Rating Scales.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of artificial intelligence-enhanced virtual patients in educational approaches to medical interview training: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of the Quality and Utility of Observer-Based Instruments for Assessing Medical Professionalism.Journal of graduate medical education · 2018Pooled it
- Assessing medical professionalism: A systematic review of instruments and their measurement properties.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Effects of 1-day e-learning education on perinatal psychological support skills among midwives and perinatal healthcare workers in Japan: a randomised controlled study.BMC psychology · 2022Trial
- Simulated patient's feedback to improve communication skills of clerkship students.BMC medical education · 2020Trial
- Concept and benefits of the Inverted Classroom method for a competency-based biochemistry course in the pre-clinical stage of a human medicine course of studies.GMS journal for medical education · 2017Trial
- Nursing Leadership Practices Among Nurse Managers in the Kumasi Metropolitan Area: An Exploratory Descriptive Qualitative Study.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Teaching communication competencies across the undergraduate medical curriculum: a qualitative exploratory case study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- How are we preparing doctors for their roles as patient educators? Exploring undergraduate and postgraduate curricula in Canadian medical schools.Canadian medical education journal · 2026Article
- Communication Skills in Medical Education and Practice: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Current Research Landscape.Cureus · 2026Review
- Understanding health systems thinking in medical education: qualitative interviews with expert clinicians.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- A longitudinal curriculum for teaching communication skills in undergraduate dental education: Evaluation and self-assessment.GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
- Use of the OSCE in assessing performance in first aid of high school students.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Student Dietitians' Perceptions and Experiences of Objective Structured Clinical Examination to Assess Communication Skills.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025Article
- Validity evidence for communication skills assessment in health professions education: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Nursing and midwifery students' perceptions of sign language training in Ghana: relevance, instructional methods, and assessment practices.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Measuring readiness for nurse-led shared decision making in clinical practice: development and first testing of the RSDM-N scale.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Psychometric validation of the informed consent assessment scale using item response theory and factor analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTeaching and assessment of communication skills have become essential in medical education. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) has been found as an appropriate means to assess communication skills within medical education. Studies have demonstrated the importance of a valid assessment of medical students' communication skills. Yet, the validity of the performance scores depends fundamentally on the quality of the rating scales used in an OSCE. Thus, this systematic review aimed at providing an overview of existing rating scales, describing their underlying definition of communication skills, determining the methodological quality of psychometric studies and the quality of psychometric properties of the identified rating scales.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review to identify psychometrically tested rating scales, which have been applied in OSCE settings to assess communication skills of medical students. Our search strategy comprised three databases (EMBASE, PsycINFO, and PubMed), reference tracking and consultation of experts. We included studies that reported psychometric properties of communication skills assessment rating scales used in OSCEs by examiners only. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the COnsensus based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. The quality of psychometric properties was evaluated using the quality criteria of Terwee and colleagues.
resultsData of twelve studies reporting on eight rating scales on communication skills assessment in OSCEs were included. Five of eight rating scales were explicitly developed based on a specific definition of communication skills. The methodological quality of studies was mainly poor. The psychometric quality of the eight rating scales was mainly intermediate. DISCUSSION: Our results reveal that future psychometric evaluation studies focusing on improving the methodological quality are needed in order to yield psychometrically sound results of the OSCEs assessing communication skills. This is especially important given that most OSCE rating scales are used for summative assessment, and thus have an impact on medical students' academic success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.