ArticlePloS one2016
Audio-Visual and Meaningful Semantic Context Enhancements in Older and Younger Adults.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Does Reading-While-Listening Facilitate Reading in Older Adults? Evidence from Eye Movements.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integration of audiovisual speech perception: From infancy to older adults.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
- The Effects of Video Presence on Associative and Source Memory Among Younger and Older Adults in a Virtual Social Simulation.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025Article
- Sensory representations and pupil-indexed listening effort provide complementary contributions to multi-talker speech intelligibility.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Noise-Vocoded Sentence Recognition and the Use of Context in Older and Younger Adult Listeners.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Independent mechanisms of temporal and linguistic cue correspondence benefiting audiovisual speech processing.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
- Aging and working memory modulate the ability to benefit from visible speech and iconic gestures during speech-in-noise comprehension.Psychological research · 2021Article
- Non-native speech recognition sentences: A new materials set for non-native speech perception research.Behavior research methods · 2020Article
- Audiovisual Temporal Perception in Aging: The Role of Multisensory Integration and Age-Related Sensory Loss.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2018Review
- Article
- Speech-In-Noise Comprehension is Improved When Viewing a Deep-Neural-Network-Generated Talking Face.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Speech perception is critical to everyday life. Oftentimes noise can degrade a speech signal; however, because of the cues available to the listener, such as visual and semantic cues, noise rarely prevents conversations from continuing. The interaction of visual and semantic cues in aiding speech perception has been studied in young adults, but the extent to which these two cues interact for older adults has not been studied. To investigate the effect of visual and semantic cues on speech perception in older and younger adults, we recruited forty-five young adults (ages 18-35) and thirty-three older adults (ages 60-90) to participate in a speech perception task. Participants were presented with semantically meaningful and anomalous sentences in audio-only and audio-visual conditions. We hypothesized that young adults would outperform older adults across SNRs, modalities, and semantic contexts. In addition, we hypothesized that both young and older adults would receive a greater benefit from a semantically meaningful context in the audio-visual relative to audio-only modality. We predicted that young adults would receive greater visual benefit in semantically meaningful contexts relative to anomalous contexts. However, we predicted that older adults could receive a greater visual benefit in either semantically meaningful or anomalous contexts. Results suggested that in the most supportive context, that is, semantically meaningful sentences presented in the audiovisual modality, older adults performed similarly to young adults. In addition, both groups received the same amount of visual and meaningful benefit. Lastly, across groups, a semantically meaningful context provided more benefit in the audio-visual modality relative to the audio-only modality, and the presence of visual cues provided more benefit in semantically meaningful contexts relative to anomalous contexts. These results suggest that older adults can perceive speech as well as younger adults when both semantic and visual cues are available to the listener.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.