Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27031320›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2016

Inhaled nitric oxide use in preterm infants in California neonatal intensive care units.

S C Handley, R H Steinhorn, A O Hopper, B Govindaswami, D R Bhatt, K P Van Meurs, R L Ariagno, J B Gould, H C Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Just Say No to iNO in Preterms-Really?The Journal of pediatrics · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

S C HandleyDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
R H SteinhornDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
A O HopperDepartment of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
B GovindaswamiDepartment of Pediatrics, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA, USA.
D R BhattDepartment of Pediatrics, Kaiser Permanente, Fontana, CA, USA.
K P Van MeursDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
R L AriagnoDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
J B GouldDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
H C LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford Health Care · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USKaiser Permanente Fontana Medical Center · USLoma Linda University · USOak Ridge Associated Universities · USSanta Clara Valley Medical Center · USStanford University · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Maternal, Clinician & Hospital Factors in Breastmilk for Premature InfantsK23HD068400 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LEE, HENRY CHONG · 2012 to 2015
$520k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD068400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) exposure in preterm infants and variation in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) use. STUDY

designThis was a retrospective cohort study of infants, 22 to 33+6/7 weeks of gestational age (GA), during 2005 to 2013. Analyses were stratified by GA and included population characteristics, iNO use over time and hospital variation.

resultsOf the 65 824 infants, 1718 (2.61%) received iNO. Infants, 22 to 24+6/7 weeks of GA, had the highest incidence of iNO exposure (6.54%). Community NICUs (n=77, median hospital use rate 0.7%) used less iNO than regional NICUs (n=23, median hospital use rate 5.8%). In 22 to 24+6/7 weeks of GA infants, the median rate in regional centers was 10.6% (hospital interquartile range 3.8% to 22.6%).

conclusioniNO exposure varied with GA and hospital level, with the most use in extremely premature infants and regional centers. Variation reflects a lack of consensus regarding the appropriate use of iNO for preterm infants.

Indexed as

Infant, Extremely PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalAdministration, InhalationBronchodilator AgentsCaliforniaFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Premature, DiseasesLogistic ModelsMaleMultivariate AnalysisNitric OxideRetrospective StudiesBronchodilator AgentsNitric Oxide

Identifiers

PMID27031320
PMCPMC4963282
OpenAlexW2323638690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.