ReviewMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2016
The role of angiogenesis in implant dentistry part II: The effect of bone-grafting and barrier membrane materials on angiogenesis.
Review in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of mid-term success in various types of zirconia implants: a retrospective clinical analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Article
- Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of natural bovine bone substitute with hyaluronate in socket preservation-a report of three cases.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025Article
- Amino Acid-Based Poly(ester urea) Biodegradable Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Application of nanoparticles as surface modifiers of dental implants for revascularization/regeneration of bone.BMC oral health · 2024Review
- A review on cutting-edge innovations in dental implantology.Bioinformation · 2024Article
- Osteoblasts and Fibroblasts Interaction with a Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix Membrane.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Healing Patterns of Non-Collagenated Bovine and Collagenated Porcine Xenografts Used for Sinus Floor Elevation: A Histological Study in Rabbits.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Polymeric Scaffolds for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Regenerative Medicine.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Angiogenesis in Regenerative Dentistry: Are We Far Enough for Therapy?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix: An Alternative to Connective Tissue Graft-A Narrative Review.International journal of dentistry · 2021Review
- Internal oblique line implants in severe mandibular atrophies.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2020Article
- Evaluation of 1-Ethyl-3-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl) Carbodiimide Cross-Linked Collagen Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration in Beagle Dogs.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Biofunctionalization of porcine-derived collagen matrices with platelet rich fibrin: influence on angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo.Clinical oral investigations · 2020Article
- Morphological Characteristics of the Osteoplastic Potential of Synthetic CaSiOJournal of functional biomaterials · 2020Article
- Nanotechnology for angiogenesis: opportunities and challenges.Chemical Society reviews · 2020Review
- A Novel Bilayer Polycaprolactone Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration: Combining Electrospinning and Emulsion Templating.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Successful soft and hard tissue augmentation with platelet-rich fibrin in combination with bovine bone space maintainer in a delayed implant placement protocol in the esthetic zone: A case report.Clinical case reports · 2019Article
- Micro-Scale Surface Patterning of Titanium Dental Implants by Anodization in the Presence of Modifying Salts.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Angiogenesis and the prevention of alveolar osteitis: a review study.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn implant dentistry, bone substitute materials and barrier membranes are used in different treatments including guided bone regeneration (GBR), socket preservation, alveolar ridge augmentation, maxillary sinus elevation, and filling bony defects around the inserted dental implant. One of the most important factors in prognosis of treatments using these materials is the growth of new blood vessels in applied areas. Present review was performed to evaluate the effect of the bone-grafting and barrier membrane materials on angiogenesis events. MATERIAL AND
methodsAn electronic search was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases via OVID using the keywords mentioned in the PubMed and MeSH headings regarding the role of angiogenesis in implant dentistry from January 2000-April 2014.
resultsOf the 5,622 articles identified in our initial search results, only 33 met the inclusion criteria set for this review. Among bone substitute materials the autogenous bone-grafts, and among the barrier membranes the collagenous membranes, had the highest angiogenic potentials. Other bone-grafting materials or membranes were mostly used with pro-angiogenic factors to enhance their angiogenic properties.
conclusionsAngiogenesis is one of the key factors, which plays a critical role in success rate of GBR technique and is seriously considered in manufacturing bone-grafting and barrier membrane materials. However, there is still lack of clinical and in-vivo studies addressing the effect of angiogenesis in treatments using bone-grafting and barrier membrane materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.