Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27031045›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2016

A model for coordinating nuclear mechanics and membrane remodeling to support nuclear integrity.

Megan C King, C Patrick Lusk

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Nuclear mechanosensing.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Nuclear envelope rupture: little holes, big openings.Current opinion in cell biology · 2018
    Review
  10. Spectrin and its interacting partners in nuclear structure and function.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Megan King: A force to be reckoned with.The Journal of cell biology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Megan C KingDepartment of Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States. Electronic address: megan.king@yale.edu.
C Patrick LuskDepartment of Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States. Electronic address: patrick.lusk@yale.edu.
Yale University · US

Funding

The mechanism of ESCRT-mediated surveillance of the nuclear envelope barrierR01GM105672 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LUSK, CHARLES PATRICK · 2013 to 2025
$4.6M
The role of nuclear architecture in adaptationDP2OD008429 · OD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KING, MEGAN C · 2011 to 2011
$2.5M
Genomic Regulation at the Nuclear PeripheryR21HG006742 · NHGRI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KING, MEGAN C, LUSK, CHARLES PATRICK · 2013 to 2014
$458k
NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG006742NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105672NIH HHS DP2 OD008429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A polymer network of intranuclear lamin filaments underlies the nuclear envelope and provides mechanical stability to the nucleus in metazoans. Recent work demonstrates that the expression of A-type lamins scales positively with the stiffness of the cellular environment, thereby coupling nuclear and extracellular mechanics. Using the spectrin-actin network at the erythrocyte plasma membrane as a model, we contemplate how the relative stiffness of the nuclear scaffold impinges on the growing number of interphase-specific nuclear envelope remodeling events, including recently discovered, nuclear envelope-specialized quality control mechanisms. We suggest that a stiffer lamina impedes these remodeling events, necessitating local lamina remodeling and/or concomitant scaling of the efficacy of membrane-remodeling machineries that act at the nuclear envelope.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansNuclear EnvelopeNuclear ProteinsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingNuclear Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27031045
PMCPMC5057576
OpenAlexW2333031019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.