Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27030711›Full record

ArticleMolecular pain2016

Differences in electrophysiological properties of functionally identified nociceptive sensory neurons in an animal model of cancer-induced bone pain.

Yong Fang Zhu, Robert Ungard, Eric Seidlitz, Natalie Zacal, Jan Huizinga, James L Henry, Gurmit Singh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pain, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Activation of the P2XMolecular pain
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yong Fang ZhuMichael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Robert UngardMichael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Eric SeidlitzMichael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Natalie ZacalMichael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jan HuizingaFarncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
James L HenryDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Gurmit SinghMichael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada singhg@mcmaster.ca.
McMaster University · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBone cancer pain is often severe, yet little is known about mechanisms generating this type of chronic pain. While previous studies have identified functional alterations in peripheral sensory neurons that correlate with bone tumours, none has provided direct evidence correlating behavioural nociceptive responses with properties of sensory neurons in an intact bone cancer model.

resultsIn a rat model of prostate cancer-induced bone pain, we confirmed tactile hypersensitivity using the von Frey test. Subsequently, we recorded intracellularly from dorsal root ganglion neurons in vivo in anesthetized animals. Neurons remained connected to their peripheral receptive terminals and were classified on the basis of action potential properties, responses to dorsal root stimulation, and to mechanical stimulation of the respective peripheral receptive fields. Neurons included C-, Aδ-, and Aβ-fibre nociceptors, identified by their expression of substance P. We suggest that bone tumour may induce phenotypic changes in peripheral nociceptors and that these could contribute to bone cancer pain.

conclusionsThis work represents a significant technical and conceptual advance in the study of peripheral nociceptor functions in the development of cancer-induced bone pain. This is the first study to report that changes in sensitivity and excitability of dorsal root ganglion primary afferents directly correspond to mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia behaviours following prostate cancer cell injection into the femur of rats. Furthermore, our unique combination of techniques has allowed us to follow, in a single neuron, mechanical pain-related behaviours, electrophysiological changes in action potential properties, and dorsal root substance P expression. These data provide a more complete understanding of this unique pain state at the cellular level that may allow for future development of mechanism-based treatments for cancer-induced bone pain.

Indexed as

Electrophysiological PhenomenaAction PotentialsAnimalsBone NeoplasmsCancer PainDisease Models, AnimalGanglia, SpinalMaleModels, NeurologicalNerve FibersNeural ConductionNociceptorsOsteolysisPain ThresholdRatsTime FactorsbehaviourBone cancerdorsal root ganglionelectrophysiologypainprimary afferentprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID27030711
PMCPMC4994860
OpenAlexW2318070250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.