Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27030667›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2016

Comparison of compensatory reserve during lower-body negative pressure and hemorrhage in nonhuman primates.

Carmen Hinojosa-Laborde, Jeffrey T Howard, Jane Mulligan, Greg Z Grudic, Victor A Convertino

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04457817 (CRI and Continuous Assessment of Hemodynamic Compensation to Guide Fluid and Pressor Management in Severely Ill Patients With COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04457817 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

CRI and Continuous Assessment of Hemodynamic Compensation to Guide Fluid and Pressor Management in Severely Ill Patients With COVID-19

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2020 to 2021Enrolled16ConditionsCOVIDArmsCRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carmen Hinojosa-LabordeU.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio Fort Sam Houston, Texas; and carmen.hinojosa-laborde.civ@mail.mil.
Jeffrey T HowardU.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio Fort Sam Houston, Texas; and.
Jane MulliganFlashback Technologies, Boulder, Colorado.
Greg Z GrudicFlashback Technologies, Boulder, Colorado.
Victor A ConvertinoU.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio Fort Sam Houston, Texas; and.
Flashback Technologies (United States) · USUnited States Army Institute of Surgical Research · USJoint Base San Antonio · US

Funding

The Southwest National Primate Research Center Supplement- Infrastructure improvements of ABSL2 holding areasP51OD011133 · OD · TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Larry S. Schlesinger · 2012 to 2026
$129.7M
NIH HHS P51 OD011133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compensatory reserve was measured in baboons (n = 13) during hemorrhage (Hem) and lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) using a machine-learning algorithm developed to estimate compensatory reserve by detecting reductions in central blood volume during LBNP. The algorithm calculates compensatory reserve index (CRI) from normovolemia (CRI = 1) to cardiovascular decompensation (CRI = 0). The hypothesis was that Hem and LBNP will elicit similar CRI values and that CRI would have higher specificity than stroke volume (SV) in predicting decompensation. Blood was removed in four steps: 6.25%, 12.5%, 18.75%, and 25% of total blood volume. Four weeks after Hem, the same animals were subjected to four levels of LBNP that was matched on the basis of their central venous pressure. Data (mean ± 95% confidence interval) indicate that CRI decreased (P < 0.001) from baseline during Hem (0.69 ± 0.10, 0.57 ± 0.09, 0.36 ± 0.10, 0.16 ± 0.08, and 0.08 ± 0.03) and LBNP (0.76 ± 0.05, 0.66 ± 0.08, 0.36 ± 0.13, 0.23 ± 0.11, and 0.14 ± 0.09). CRI was not different between Hem and LBNP (P = 0.20). Linear regression analysis between Hem CRI and LBNP CRI revealed a slope of 1.03 and a correlation coefficient of 0.96. CRI exhibited greater specificity than SV in both Hem (92.3 vs. 82.1) and LBNP (94.8 vs. 83.1) and greater ROC AUC in Hem (0.94 vs. 0.84) and LBNP (0.94 vs. 0.92). These data support the hypothesis that Hem and LBNP elicited the same CRI response, suggesting that measurement of compensatory reserve is superior to SV as a predictor of cardiovascular decompensation.

Indexed as

Arterial PressureDisease Models, AnimalStroke VolumeAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBaroreflexBlood PressureBlood VolumeHeart FailureHemorrhageHumansLegLower Body Negative PressureMalePapioReproducibility of Resultsblood lossblood pressurecentral hypovolemiacompensatory mechanismsstroke volume

Identifiers

PMID27030667
PMCPMC5504419
OpenAlexW2322405399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.