ReviewJournal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews2016
Exposure to Power-Frequency Magnetic Fields and the Risk of Infertility and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Update on the Human Evidence and Recommendations for Future Study Designs.
Review in Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00011713 (Human Exposure to Bisphenol A, Phthalates and Fertility, Pregnancy Outcomes.), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Human Exposure to Bisphenol A, Phthalates and Fertility, Pregnancy Outcomes.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electromagnetic shielding performance and mechanical properties of vermiculite-based lightweight geopolymer mortars.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Assessment of Reproductive Health Knowledge Among College Students in Northwestern India: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Association of living environmental and occupational factors with semen quality in chinese men: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Risk of congenital heart disease due to exposure to common electrical appliances during early pregnancy: a case-control study.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Association of personal exposure to power-frequency magnetic fields with pregnancy outcomes among women seeking fertility treatment in a longitudinal cohort study.Fertility and sterility · 2020Article
- Maternal proximity to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and risk of birth defects.European journal of epidemiology · 2019Article
- Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields of High Voltage Overhead Power Lines and Female Infertility.The international journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2019Article
- Evaluation of the electromagnetic field intensity in operating rooms and estimation of occupational exposures of personnel.Interventional medicine & applied science · 2018Article
- Biological effects of the hypomagnetic field: An analytical review of experiments and theories.PloS one · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infertility and adverse pregnancy outcomes are significant public health concerns with global prevalence. Over the past 35 years, research has addressed whether exposure to power-frequency magnetic fields is one of the etiologic factors attributed to these conditions. However, no apparent authoritative reviews on this topic have been published in the peer-reviewed literature for nearly 15 years. This review provides an overview and critical analysis of human studies that were published in the peer-reviewed literature between 2002 and July 2015. Using PubMed, 13 epidemiology studies published during this time frame that concern exposure to magnetic fields and adverse prenatal (e.g., miscarriage), neonatal (e.g., preterm birth or birth defects), and male fertility (e.g., poor semen quality) outcomes were identified. Some of these studies reported associations whereas others did not, and study design limitations may explain these inconsistencies. Future investigations need to be designed with these limitations in mind to address existing research gaps. In particular, the following issues are discussed: (1) importance of selecting the appropriate study population, (2) need for addressing confounding due to unmeasured physical activity, (3) importance of minimizing information bias from exposure measurement error, (4) consideration of alternative magnetic field exposure metrics, and (5) implications and applications of personal exposure data that are correlated within female-male couples. Further epidemiologic research is needed, given the near ubiquitous exposures to power-frequency magnetic fields in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.