Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27030583›Full record

ReviewJournal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews2016

Exposure to Power-Frequency Magnetic Fields and the Risk of Infertility and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Update on the Human Evidence and Recommendations for Future Study Designs.

Ryan C Lewis, Russ Hauser, Andrew D Maynard, Richard L Neitzel, Lu Wang, Robert Kavet, John D Meeker

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00011713 (Human Exposure to Bisphenol A, Phthalates and Fertility, Pregnancy Outcomes.), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00011713 completednot on this map

Human Exposure to Bisphenol A, Phthalates and Fertility, Pregnancy Outcomes.

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)Ran1999 to 2020Enrolled1,474ConditionsInfertilityArmsCompletion questionnaires/providing biological samples
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields of High Voltage Overhead Power Lines and Female Infertility.The international journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryan C Lewisa Department of Environmental Health Sciences , University of Michigan School of Public Health , Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA.
Russ Hauserc Departments of Environmental Health and Epidemiology , Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.
Andrew D Maynarda Department of Environmental Health Sciences , University of Michigan School of Public Health , Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA.
Richard L Neitzela Department of Environmental Health Sciences , University of Michigan School of Public Health , Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA.
Lu Wange Department of Biostatistics , University of Michigan School of Public Health , Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA.
Robert Kavetf Electric Power Research Institute , Palo Alto , California , USA.
John D Meekera Department of Environmental Health Sciences , University of Michigan School of Public Health , Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA.

Funding

PCBs, Phthalates and Male Reproductive HealthR01ES009718 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI HAUSER, RUSS B · 1999 to 2018
$11.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES009718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infertility and adverse pregnancy outcomes are significant public health concerns with global prevalence. Over the past 35 years, research has addressed whether exposure to power-frequency magnetic fields is one of the etiologic factors attributed to these conditions. However, no apparent authoritative reviews on this topic have been published in the peer-reviewed literature for nearly 15 years. This review provides an overview and critical analysis of human studies that were published in the peer-reviewed literature between 2002 and July 2015. Using PubMed, 13 epidemiology studies published during this time frame that concern exposure to magnetic fields and adverse prenatal (e.g., miscarriage), neonatal (e.g., preterm birth or birth defects), and male fertility (e.g., poor semen quality) outcomes were identified. Some of these studies reported associations whereas others did not, and study design limitations may explain these inconsistencies. Future investigations need to be designed with these limitations in mind to address existing research gaps. In particular, the following issues are discussed: (1) importance of selecting the appropriate study population, (2) need for addressing confounding due to unmeasured physical activity, (3) importance of minimizing information bias from exposure measurement error, (4) consideration of alternative magnetic field exposure metrics, and (5) implications and applications of personal exposure data that are correlated within female-male couples. Further epidemiologic research is needed, given the near ubiquitous exposures to power-frequency magnetic fields in the general population.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeEnvironmental ExposureFemaleFetal DevelopmentHumansInfant, NewbornInfertilityMagnetic FieldsMalePregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsResearch DesignRisk

Identifiers

PMID27030583
PMCPMC4848457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.