Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27030518›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Prioritization of anticancer drugs against a cancer using genomic features of cancer cells: A step towards personalized medicine.

Sudheer Gupta, Kumardeep Chaudhary, Rahul Kumar, Ankur Gautam, Jagpreet Singh Nanda, Sandeep Kumar Dhanda, Samir Kumar Brahmachari, Gajendra P S Raghava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Tissue specificity of in vitro drug sensitivity.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Machine Learning in Drug Discovery: A Review.Artificial intelligence review · 2022
    Article
  11. Artificial Intelligence for Precision Oncology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. AI applications in functional genomics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  15. Network-based drug sensitivity prediction.BMC medical genomics · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. PLATYPUS: A Multiple-View Learning Predictive Framework for Cancer Drug Sensitivity Prediction.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sudheer GuptaBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39A, Chandigarh, India.
Kumardeep ChaudharyBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39A, Chandigarh, India.
Rahul KumarBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39A, Chandigarh, India.
Ankur GautamBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39A, Chandigarh, India.
Jagpreet Singh NandaBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39A, Chandigarh, India.
Sandeep Kumar DhandaBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39A, Chandigarh, India.
Samir Kumar BrahmachariCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Mathura Road, New Delhi-110007, India.
Gajendra P S RaghavaBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39A, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we investigated drug profile of 24 anticancer drugs tested against a large number of cell lines in order to understand the relation between drug resistance and altered genomic features of a cancer cell line. We detected frequent mutations, high expression and high copy number variations of certain genes in both drug resistant cell lines and sensitive cell lines. It was observed that a few drugs, like Panobinostat, are effective against almost all types of cell lines, whereas certain drugs are effective against only a limited type of cell lines. Tissue-specific preference of drugs was also seen where a drug is more effective against cell lines belonging to a specific tissue. Genomic features based models have been developed for each anticancer drug and achieved average correlation between predicted and actual growth inhibition of cell lines in the range of 0.43 to 0.78. We hope, our study will throw light in the field of personalized medicine, particularly in designing patient-specific anticancer drugs. In order to serve the scientific community, a webserver, CancerDP, has been developed for predicting priority/potency of an anticancer drug against a cancer cell line using its genomic features (http://crdd.osdd.net/raghava/cancerdp/).

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticModels, GeneticAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorDNA Copy Number VariationsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansHydroxamic AcidsIndolesNeoplasm ProteinsOrgan SpecificityPanobinostatPrecision MedicineAntineoplastic AgentsHydroxamic AcidsIndolesNeoplasm ProteinsPanobinostat

Identifiers

PMID27030518
PMCPMC4814902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.