Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27030493›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Small Membrane Filtration Method for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in a High-HIV-Prevalence Setting.

Yap Boum, Soyeon Kim, Patrick Orikiriza, Carlos Acuña-Villaorduña, Solange Vinhas, Maryline Bonnet, Dan Nyehangane, Juliet Mwanga-Amumpaire, Kevin P Fennelly, Edward C Jones-López

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Yap BoumEpicentre, Médecins sans Frontières, Mbarara, Uganda.
Soyeon KimDepartment of Biostatistics, Rutgers School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
Patrick OrikirizaEpicentre, Médecins sans Frontières, Mbarara, Uganda.
Carlos Acuña-VillaorduñaSection of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Solange VinhasNúcleo de Doenças Infecciosas (NDI), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória, Brazil.
Maryline BonnetEpicentre, Médecins sans Frontières, Mbarara, Uganda.
Dan NyehanganeEpicentre, Médecins sans Frontières, Mbarara, Uganda.
Juliet Mwanga-AmumpaireEpicentre, Médecins sans Frontières, Mbarara, Uganda.
Kevin P FennellyDivision of Global Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida at Gainesville, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Edward C Jones-LópezSection of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA edward.jones@bmc.org.
Mbarara University of Science and Technology · UGBoston Medical Center · USBoston University · USEpicentre Uganda · UGInserm · FRRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BRUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sputum acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy has suboptimal sensitivity but remains the most commonly used laboratory test to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). We prospectively evaluated the small membrane filtration (SMF) method that concentrates AFB in a smaller area to facilitate detection to improve the diagnostic performance of microscopy. We enrolled adults with suspicion of pulmonary TB from health facilities in southwestern Uganda. Clinical history, physical examination, and 3 sputum samples were obtained for direct fluorescent AFB smear, SMF, Xpert MTB/RIF, and MGIT culture media. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated for SMF, AFB smear, and Xpert MTB/RIF, using MGIT as the reference standard. The analysis was stratified according to HIV status. From September 2012 to April 2014, 737 participants were included in the HIV-infected stratum (146 [20.5%] were culture positive) and 313 were in the HIV-uninfected stratum (85 [28%] were culture positive). In HIV-infected patients, the sensitivity of a single SMF was 67.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.9% to 74.1%); for AFB, 68.0% (95% CI, 60.6% to 74.6%); and for Xpert MTB/RIF, 91.0% (95% CI, 85.0% to 94.8%). In HIV-uninfected patients, the corresponding sensitivities were 72.5% (95% CI, 62.1% to 80.9%), 80.3% (95% CI, 70.8% to 87.2%), and 93.5% (95% CI, 85.7% to 97.2%). The specificity for all 3 tests in both HIV groups was ≥96%. In this setting, the SMF method did not improve the diagnostic accuracy of sputum AFB. The Xpert MTB/RIF assay performed well in both HIV-infected and -uninfected groups.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBacteriological TechniquesFemaleFiltrationHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMicroscopyMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingSputum

Identifiers

PMID27030493
PMCPMC4879284
OpenAlexW2322519707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.