Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27029822›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2016

Using Cognitive Interviewing to Better Assess Young Adult E-cigarette Use.

Josephine T Hinds, Alexandra Loukas, Sherman Chow, Keryn E Pasch, Melissa B Harrell, Cheryl L Perry, Cristine Delnevo, Olivia A Wackowski

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Type of E-Cigarette Device Used Among Adolescents and Young Adults: Findings From a Pooled Analysis of Eight Studies of 2166 Vapers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2018
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The e-cigarette assessment for youth-Revised (EAsY-R): Preliminary results of a pilot study of measure refinement via cognitive interviewing.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Adolescents' Understanding of Smoking and Vaping Risk Language: Cognitive Interviews to Inform Scale Development.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Critical Challenges and Creative Solutions for Quantifying Nicotine Vaping: Qualitative Reports From Young Adults.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. A Longitudinal Examination of Behavioral Transitions among Young Adult Menthol and Non-Menthol Cigarette Smokers Using a Three-State Markov Model.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Who is JUULing and Why? An Examination of Young Adult Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Users.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2020
    Article
  19. Development of Dietary Knowledge and Adherence Questionnaires for Lebanese Adolescents and Their Parents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Josephine T HindsDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Alexandra LoukasDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Sherman ChowDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Keryn E PaschDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Melissa B HarrellUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health-Austin Regional Campus, Austin, TX.
Cheryl L PerryUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health-Austin Regional Campus, Austin, TX.
Cristine DelnevoCenter for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers School of Public Health, New Brunswick, NJ.
Olivia A WackowskiCenter for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers School of Public Health, New Brunswick, NJ.
The University of Texas at Austin · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Training & Education Core p335-350P50CA180906 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI PERRY, CHERYL LEE · 2013 to 2017
$19.7M
Developing and testing warning statements about e-cigarettesK01CA189301 · NCI · RBHS-SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI WACKOWSKI, OLIVIA · 2014 to 2016
$478k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA189301NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCharacteristics of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) make assessment of their use a challenge for researchers. Cognitive interviews are a way of gaining insight into participants' interpretations of survey questions and the methods they use in answering them, to improve survey tools.

methodsWe used cognitive interviews to modify a young adult survey and improve assessment of quantity and frequency of ENDS use, as well as reasons for initiation and use of ENDS products. Twenty-five college students between the ages of 18 and 32 participated in individual cognitive interviews, which assessed question comprehension, answer estimation, retrieval processes, and answer response processes.

resultsComprehension issues arose discerning between ENDS device types (eg, cigalikes vs. vape pens), and answer estimation issues arose regarding ENDS use as drug delivery systems. These issues appeared to improve when pictures were added specifying the device in question, as well as when specific language naming nicotine as the ENDS product content was added to survey questions. Regarding answer retrieval, this sample of users had problems reporting their frequency of ENDS use, as well as quantifying the amount of ENDS products consumed (eg, volume of e-juice, number of cartridges, nicotine concentration).

conclusionsAccurate assessment of ENDS products proved challenging, but cognitive interviews provided valuable insight into survey interpretation that was otherwise inaccessible to researchers. Future research that explores how to assess the wide array of ENDS devices, as well as possible population differences among specific device-type users would be valuable to public health researchers and professionals. IMPLICATIONS: This study extends the current literature by using cognitive interviews to test ENDS assessment questions in a sample of young adults, a population at elevated risk for ENDS use. Problems encountered when answering ENDS use questions underscore the need to develop easily understood ENDS questions that allow for quantification of ENDS use. Future research examining the nature of ENDS product types and different levels of user experience will yield valuable assessment tools for researchers and tobacco control professionals.

Indexed as

CognitionInterviews as TopicAdolescentAdultElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleNicotineReproducibility of ResultsSmoking CessationTexasYoung AdultNicotine

Identifiers

PMID27029822
PMCPMC5896803
OpenAlexW2328233990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.