Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27029783›Full record

ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2016

How to evaluate BP measurements using the oscillometric method in atrial fibrillation: the value of pulse rate variation.

Xi-Xing Wang, Wei Shuai, Kui Hong, Jinsong Xu, Ju-Xiang Li, Ping Li, Xiao-Shu Cheng, Hai Su

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Consistency of Blood Pressure Measurement Methods in Atrial Fibrillation.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The impact of atrial fibrillation on accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement: effect of ventricular rate.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xi-Xing WangDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China.
Wei ShuaiDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China.
Kui HongDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China.
Jinsong XuDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China.
Ju-Xiang LiDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China.
Ping LiDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China.
Xiao-Shu ChengDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China.
Hai SuDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CNNanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An oscillometric device is recommended for blood pressure (BP) measurement in atrial fibrillation (AF), but there is still controversy concerning its accuracy. Therefore, evaluation of BP values in AF patients remains a challenge. This study included 251 patients with AF and 154 participants with sinus rhythm (SR). Pulse rate (PR) and BP were measured using an oscillometric device three times. The differences between the highest and lowest PR and the systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) were calculated as ΔPR, ΔSBP and ΔDBP, respectively. AF patients were stratified with respect to ΔPR in 0-5, 6-10, 11-15 and >15 subgroups. The AF group had a greater ΔPR (12.1±8.6 vs. 4.10±3.21 b.p.m., P<0.001), ΔSBP and ΔDBP than the SR group at similar SBP and DBP. A positive correlation existed between ΔPR and ΔSBP (r=0.255, P<0.001) in AF patients, but no correlation was found in SR subjects. Meanwhile, the ΔSBP in the 0-5 and 6-10 subgroups (9.58±5.61 and 10.67±6.77 vs. 8.45±5.25 mm Hg, nonsignificant) was similar to the SR group, whereas ΔSBP in the 11-15 and >15 subgroups was significantly greater than the SR group. Regardless of ΔPR, the ΔDBP in the AF group was significantly greater than that of the SR group. The AF patients who exhibited greater variability in their PR also had a greater variability in their SBP readings. The SBP measurement for AF patients is accurate as the measurement for patients with SR if the ΔPR is of 0-10 b.p.m. in AF.

Indexed as

OscillometryAdultAgedAtrial FibrillationBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID27029783
OpenAlexW2313149520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.