ArticleBMC cancer2016
Cervical and breast cancer screening participation for women with chronic conditions in France: results from a national health survey.
Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening uptake among Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic women in the United Kingdom: evidence from a mixed-methods systematic review.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetologia · 2020Pooled it
- Association of Nonadherence to Cancer Screening Examinations With Mortality From Unrelated Causes: A Secondary Analysis of the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2019Trial
- Retrospective Analysis of Long-term Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Mammographic Breast Cancer Screening.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2026Article
- Observational
- eHealth literacy and cancer screening attitudes among chronic patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Organized Breast Cancer Screening in Diabetic Women: A Prospective Study Among 100,000 Women from the Grand-Est Region (France), from 2020 to 2022.European journal of breast health · 2025Article
- Factors associated with age at first screening for cervical cancer among adult Cape Verdean women: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Cervical cancer screening among women with comorbidities: evidence from the 2022 Tanzania demographic and health survey.BMC public health · 2024Article
- The Effectiveness of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery in Preventing Gynecologic Cancer - from Pathophysiology to Clinical Outcomes.Journal of Cancer · 2024Review
- Knowledge and perception of cancer screening tests among Indian community.Bioinformation · 2024Article
- Sex and income inequalities in preventive services in diabetes.The European journal of general practice · 2023Article
- Public Knowledge, Practice, and Attitude Regarding Cancer Screening: A Community-Based Study in Saudi Arabia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Organized Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: Attendance and Determinants in Rural China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- A Preliminary Study on Exploring a potential Ultrasound Method for Predicting Cervical Cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2022Article
- Mediation Effect of Health Beliefs in the Relationship Between Health Knowledge and Uptake of Mammography in a National Breast Cancer Screening Program in Taiwan.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Article
- Self-reported breast and cervical cancer screening practices among women in Ghana: predictive factors and reproductive health policy implications from the WHO study on global AGEing and adult health.BMC women's health · 2020Article
- Impact of diabetes on colorectal cancer stage and mortality risk: a population-based cohort study.Diabetologia · 2020Article
- Combined Effect of Health Status and Primary Care Use on Participation in Cancer Screening: The CONSTANCES Cohort.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComorbidity at the time of diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor for survival among women suffering from cervical or breast cancer. Although cancer screening practices have proven their efficacy for mortality reduction, little is known about adherence to screening recommendations for women suffering from chronic conditions. We investigated the association between eleven chronic conditions and adherence to cervical and breast cancer screening recommendations in France.
methodUsing data from a cross-sectional national health survey conducted in 2008, we analyzed screening participation taking into account self-reported: inflammatory systemic disease, cancer, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, depression, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, obesity, osteoarthritis and thyroid disorders. We first computed age-standardized screening rates among women who reported each condition. We then estimated the effect of having reported each condition on adherence to screening recommendations in logistic regression models, with adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, socioeconomic position, health behaviours, healthcare access and healthcare use. Finally, we investigated the association between chronic conditions and opportunistic versus organized breast cancer screening using multinomial logistic regression.
resultsThe analyses were conducted among 4226 women for cervical cancer screening and 2056 women for breast cancer screening. Most conditions studied were not associated with screening participation. Adherence to cervical cancer screening recommendations was higher for cancer survivors (OR = 1.73 [0.98-3.05]) and lower for obese women (OR = 0.73 [0.57-0.93]), when accounting for our complete range of screening determinants. Women reporting chronic respiratory disease or diabetes participated less in cervical cancer screening, except when adjusting for socioeconomic characteristics. Adherence to breast cancer screening recommendations was lower for obese women and women reporting diabetes, even after accounting for our complete range of screening determinants (OR = 0.71 [0.52-0.96] and OR = 0.55 [0.36-0.83] respectively). The lower breast cancer screening participation for obese women was more pronounced for opportunistic than for organized screening.
conclusionWe identified conditions associated with participation in cervical and breast cancer screening, even when accounting for major determinants of cancer screening. Obese women participated less in cervical cancer screening. Obese women and women with diabetes participated less in mammographic screening and organized breast cancer screening seemed to insufficiently address barriers to participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.