Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27029492›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2016

Girdin (GIV) Expression as a Prognostic Marker of Recurrence in Mismatch Repair-Proficient Stage II Colon Cancer.

Pradipta Ghosh, Jeanne Tie, Andrea Muranyi, Shalini Singh, Patrick Brunhoeber, Katherine Leith, Rebecca Bowermaster, Zhiming Liao, Yifei Zhu, Bonnie LaFleur and 13 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pradipta GhoshDepartments of Medicine and Cell and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California.
Jeanne TieWalter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Australia. The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. Western Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Andrea MuranyiVentana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, Arizona.
Shalini SinghVentana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, Arizona.
Patrick BrunhoeberVentana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, Arizona.
Katherine LeithVentana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, Arizona.
Rebecca BowermasterVentana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, Arizona.
Zhiming LiaoSpring Bioscience, Pleasanton, California.
Yifei ZhuSpring Bioscience, Pleasanton, California.
Bonnie LaFleurVentana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, Arizona.
Ben TranWalter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Australia. The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. Western Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Jayesh DesaiWalter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Australia. The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Ian JonesThe Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Matthew CroxfordWestern Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Rodrigo JoverDepartment of Gastroenterology, General Hospital University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Ajay GoelBaylor Research Institute and Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
Paul WaringDepartment of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Song HuF. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Volker TeichgraberF. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Ulrich-Peter RohrF. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Ruediger RidderVentana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, Arizona.
Kandavel ShanmugamVentana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, Arizona. peter.gibbs@mh.org.au kandavel.shanmugam@roche.com.
Peter GibbsWalter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Australia. The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. Western Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. peter.gibbs@mh.org.au kandavel.shanmugam@roche.com.
Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DIANE M SIMEONE · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
Training Grant in GastroenterologyT32DK007202 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GHOSH, PRADIPTA · 1985 to 2022
$7.7M
Spatial Regulation of RGS and G Protein SignalingR01CA100768 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GHOSH, PRADIPTA · 2003 to 2019
$7.4M
The Biology and Diagnosis of HNPCCR01CA072851 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI GOEL, AJAY · 1996 to 2019
$6.6M
Aspirin and Cancer Prevention in Lynch Syndrome: From Cell to Population DataU01CA187956 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI GOEL, AJAY, WODARZ, DOMINIK F · 2014 to 2018
$2.7M
Modulation of G proteins by Growth FactorsR01CA160911 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GHOSH, PRADIPTA · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
METHYLATION BIOMARKER DEVELOPMENT FOR NONINVASIVE DETECTION OF COLORECTAL CANCERR01CA181572 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI GOEL, AJAY · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100NCI NIH HHS R01 CA072851NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100768NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160911NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181572NCI NIH HHS U01 CA187956NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrognostic markers that identify patients with stage II colon cancers who are at the risk of recurrence are essential to personalize therapy. We evaluated the potential of GIV/Girdin as a predictor of recurrence risk in such patients. EXPERIMENTAL

designExpression of full-length GIV was evaluated by IHC using a newly developed mAb together with a mismatch repair (MMR)-specific antibody panel in three stage II colon cancer patient cohorts, that is, a training (n = 192), test (n = 317), and validation (n = 181) cohort, with clinical follow-up data. Recurrence risk stratification models were established in the training cohort of T3, proficient MMR (pMMR) patients without chemotherapy and subsequently validated.

resultsFor T3 pMMR tumors, GIV expression and the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were the only factors predicting recurrence in both training (GIV: HR, 2.78, P = 0.013; LVI: HR, 2.54, P = 0.025) and combined test and validation (pooled) cohorts (GIV: HR, 1.85, P = 0.019; LVI: HR, 2.52, P = 0.0004). A risk model based on GIV expression and LVI status classified patients into high- or low-risk groups; 3-year recurrence-free survival was significantly lower in the high-risk versus low-risk group across all cohorts [Training: 52.3% vs. 84.8%; HR, 3.74, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.50-9.32; Test: 85.9% vs. 97.9%, HR, 7.83, 95% CI, 1.03-59.54; validation: 59.4% vs. 84.4%, HR, 3.71, 95% CI, 1.24-11.12].

conclusionsGIV expression status predicts recurrence risk in patients with T3 pMMR stage II colon cancer. A risk model combining GIV expression and LVI status information further enhances prediction of recurrence. Further validation studies are warranted before GIV status can be routinely included in patient management algorithms. Clin Cancer Res; 22(14); 3488-98. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantColonic NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleHumansMaleMicrofilament ProteinsNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisVesicular Transport ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorCCDC88A protein, humanMicrofilament ProteinsVesicular Transport Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27029492
PMCPMC4947424
OpenAlexW2332208114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.