ArticleVirulence2016
Immuno-physiological adaptations confer wax moth Galleria mellonella resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis.
Article in Virulence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.
- Calcineurin-dependent 20E signaling pathway enhances attacin expression to prime the immunity of Helicoverpa armigera against Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxin.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- The RNA-binding protein Squid regulates embryonic midgut development via Axin alternative splicing in Bombyx mori.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Improving the odds of survival: transgenerational effects of infections.EMBO molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- PxDorsal Regulates the Expression of Antimicrobial Peptides and Affects the Bt Susceptibility ofInsects · 2025Article
- Innate Immunity in Insects: The Lights and Shadows of Phenoloxidase System Activation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Gut yeast diversity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Studies of Streptococcus anginosus Virulence in Dictyostelium discoideum and Galleria mellonella Models.Infection and immunity · 2023Article
- Lepidopteran insects: emerging model organisms to study infection by enteropathogens.Folia microbiologica · 2023Review
- Review
- Residual Effects of Transgenic Cotton on the Intestinal Microbiota ofMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Effects of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- The immunostimulatory role of anFrontiers in insect science · 2023Article
- RNAi-mediated knockdown of gut receptor-like genes prohibitin and α-amylase altered the susceptibility of Galleria mellonella to Cry1AcF toxin.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- The Effect of Silicon Dioxide Nanoparticles Combined with Entomopathogenic Bacteria or Fungus on the Survival of Colorado Potato Beetle and Cabbage Beetles.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparative Nanopore Sequencing-Based Evaluation of the Midgut Microbiota of the Summer Chafer (International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Hemocyte response to treatment of susceptible and resistant Asian corn borer (Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Laser capture microdissection to study Bacillus cereus iron homeostasis gene expression during Galleria mellonella in vivo gut colonization.Virulence · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Microevolutionary mechanisms of resistance to a bacterial pathogen were explored in a population of the Greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella, selected for an 8.8-fold increased resistance against the entomopathogenic bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) compared with a non-selected (suspectible) line. Defense strategies of the resistant and susceptible insect lines were compared to uncover mechanisms underpinning resistance, and the possible cost of those survival strategies. In the uninfected state, resistant insects exhibited enhanced basal expression of genes related to regeneration and amelioration of Bt toxin activity in the midgut. In addition, these insects also exhibited elevated activity of genes linked to inflammation/stress management and immune defense in the fat body. Following oral infection with Bt, the expression of these genes was further elevated in the fat body and midgut of both lines and to a greater extent some of them in resistant line than the susceptible line. This gene expression analysis reveals a pattern of resistance mechanisms targeted to sites damaged by Bt with the insect placing greater emphasis on tissue repair as revealed by elevated expression of these genes in both the fat body and midgut epithelium. Unlike the susceptible insects, Bt infection significantly reduced the diversity and richness (abundance) of the gut microbiota in the resistant insects. These observations suggest that the resistant line not only has a more intact midgut but is secreting antimicrobial factors into the gut lumen which not only mitigate Bt activity but also affects the viability of other gut bacteria. Remarkably the resistant line employs multifactorial adaptations for resistance to Bt without any detected negative trade off since the insects exhibited higher fecundity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.