Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27029393›Full record

ReviewThe neuroradiology journal2016

Post-operative imaging in deep brain stimulation: A controversial issue.

Christian Saleh, Georges Dooms, Christophe Berthold, Frank Hertel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The neuroradiology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Biomarkers for Epilepsy Deep Brain Stimulation.Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. TJournal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A statistical framework for quantification and visualisation of positional uncertainty in deep brain stimulation electrodes.Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Imaging & visualization · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christian SalehDepartment of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg chs12us75010@yahoo.com.
Georges DoomsDepartment of Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Christophe BertholdDepartment of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Frank HertelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In deep brain stimulation (DBS), post-operative imaging has been used on the one hand to assess complications, such as haemorrhage; and on the other hand, to detect misplaced contacts. The post-operative determination of the accurate location of the final electrode plays a critical role in evaluating the precise area of effective stimulation and for predicting the potential clinical outcome; however, safety remains a priority in postoperative DBS imaging. A plethora of diverse post-operative imaging methods have been applied at different centres. There is neither a consensus on the most efficient post-operative imaging methodology, nor is there any standardisation for the automatic or manual analysis of the images within the different imaging modalities. In this article, we give an overview of currently applied post-operative imaging modalities and discuss the current challenges in post-operative imaging in DBS.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationNeuroimagingBrainHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPubMedArtefactbrain imagingbrain shiftcomplicationscomputed tomographydeep brain stimulationelectrode positionimage analysismagnetic resonance imagingmethodologypost-operative imaging

Identifiers

PMID27029393
PMCPMC4978322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.