Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27029340›Full record

SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2016

Comparison of the effectiveness of polyethylene glycol with and without electrolytes in constipation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Peter Katelaris, Vasi Naganathan, Ken Liu, George Krassas, John Gullotta

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudySystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06349031 (Comparison of Efficacy & Tolerability Of Polyethylene Glycol 4000 Versus Polyethylene Glycol 3350+ Electrolytes For Fecal Disimpaction in Pediatric Functional Constipation), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06349031 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Efficacy & Tolerability Of Polyethylene Glycol 4000 Versus Polyethylene Glycol 3350+ Electrolytes For Fecal Disimpaction in Pediatric Functional Constipation: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitute of Medical Sciences and SUM HospitalRan2024 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsFunctional Constipation, Fecal Impaction, Constipation - Functional, Constipation Chronic IdiopathicArmsAdministration of Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) 4000 as per treatment allocation to participants, Administration of Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) 3350 + Electrolyte as per treatment allocation to participants
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The mechanisms and management of fecal incontinence in geriatric neurological diseases.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Medical Management of Constipation in Elderly Patients: Systematic Review.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peter KatelarisGastroenterology Department, Concord Hospital, The University of Sydney, Hospital Rd, Concord, NSW, Australia. peter.katelaris@sydney.edu.au.
Vasi NaganathanCentre for Education and Research on Ageing and The Ageing and Alzheimers Institute, University of Sydney and Concord Hospital, Hospital Rd, Concord, NSW, Australia.
Ken LiuAW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
George KrassasScius Healthcare Solutions Pty Ltd, PO Box 84, Northbridge, NSW, Australia.
John GullottaMatraville Medical Centre, 165a Perry St, Matraville, NSW, 2036, Australia.
Concord Repatriation General Hospital · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolyethylene glycol is commonly used to manage constipation and is available with or without electrolytes. The addition of electrolytes dates back to its initial development as lavage solutions in preparation for gastrointestinal interventions. The clinical utility of the addition of electrolytes to polyethylene glycol for the management of constipation is not established. The objective of this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was to assess the relative effectiveness of polyethylene glycol with (PEG + E) or without electrolytes (PEG) in the management of functional constipation in adults.

methodsA systematic review was conducted to identify randomised controlled clinical trials that assessed the use of polyethylene glycol in functional constipation. The primary outcome was the mean number of bowel movements per week.

resultsNineteen studies were included in the NMA (PEG N = 9, PEG + E N = 8, PEG versus PEG + E N = 2; involving 2247 patients). PEG and PEG + E are both effective, increasing the number of bowel movements per week by 1.8 (95 % Crl 1.0, 2.8) and 1.9 (95 % Crl 0.9, 3.0) respectively versus placebo and by 1.8 (95 % Crl 0.0, 3.5) and 1.9 (95 % Crl 0.2, 3.6) respectively versus lactulose. There was no efficacy difference between PEG + E and PEG (0.1, 95 % Crl -1.1, 1.2) and there were no differences in safety or tolerability.

conclusionsPolyethylene glycol with and without electrolytes are effective and safe treatments for constipation in adults. The addition of electrolytes to polyethylene glycol does not appear to offer any clinical benefits over polyethylene glycol alone in the management of constipation.

Indexed as

ConstipationElectrolytesHumansPolyethylene GlycolsSurface-Active AgentsTreatment OutcomeElectrolytesPolyethylene GlycolsSurface-Active AgentsConstipationMacrogolMeta-analysisPolyethylene glycolSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27029340
PMCPMC4815254
OpenAlexW2331527655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.