Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27029312›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2013

"How Do You Feel about Antibiotics for This?" A Qualitative Study of Physician Attitudes towards a Context-Rich Communication Skills Method.

Jochen W L Cals, Mirjam E van Leeuwen, Fleur H F Chappin, Eefje G P M de Bont, Geert-Jan Dinant, Christopher C Butler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care: an updated and expanded meta-ethnography.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jochen W L CalsDepartment of General Practice, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. j.cals@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Mirjam E van LeeuwenDepartment of General Practice, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. mirjam.vanleeuwen8@gmail.com.
Fleur H F ChappinDepartment of General Practice, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. fleurchappin@ziggo.nl.
Eefje G P M de BontDepartment of General Practice, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. eefje.debont@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Geert-Jan DinantDepartment of General Practice, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. geertjan.dinant@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Christopher C ButlerInstitute of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK. butlercc@cardiff.ac.uk.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLCardiff Metropolitan University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore experiences with and views of general practitioners (GPs) on a physician communication training method in primary care and its applicability and implementation in daily practice, we performed a semi-structured qualitative study of GPs' experience of training in and implementing a communication skills training program for managing lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) which included a seminar, simulated patient consultation together with providing and receiving feedback on ones own transcript, and a seminar in a structured approach to the LRTI consultation. Seventeen out of 20 eligible GPs who had participated in the IMPAC³T trial and were allocated to receiving enhanced physician communication training for managing lower respiratory tract infection participated. GPs' experiences with the physician communication training method and its specific components were positive. The method gave GPs additional tools for managing LRTI consultations and increased their sense of providing evidence-based management. During the study, GPs reported using almost all communication items covered in the training, but some GPs stated that the communication skills diluted over time, and that they continued to use a selected set of the skills. The general communication items were most regularly used. Implementation of the method in daily practice helped GPs to prescribe fewer antibiotics in LRTI with the only perceived disadvantage being time-pressure. This study suggests that GPs felt positive about the physician communication training method for enhanced management of LRTI in primary care. GPs continued to use some of the communication items, of which general communication items were the most common. Furthermore, GPs believed that implementation of the communication skills in daily practice helped them to prescribe fewer antibiotics. The context-rich communication method could have wider application in common conditions in primary care.

Indexed as

communication itemscommunication training methodLRTIpatient-centeredprimary carequalitative study

Identifiers

PMID27029312
PMCPMC4790273
OpenAlexW2092392645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.