Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27028935›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2016

Optimal Combinations of Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies for Prevention and Treatment of HIV-1 Clade C Infection.

Kshitij Wagh, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Carolyn Williamson, Alex Robles, Madeleine Bayne, Jetta Garrity, Michael Rist, Cecilia Rademeyer, Hyejin Yoon, Alan Lapedes and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 149 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
149citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

149 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 196 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Recurrent mutations drive rapid HIV escape from two broadly neutralizing antibodies in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Kshitij WaghTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Tanmoy BhattacharyaTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Carolyn WilliamsonDivision of Medical Virology, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town and NHLS, Cape Town, South Africa.
Alex RoblesCenter for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Madeleine BayneCenter for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jetta GarrityCenter for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Michael RistCenter for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Cecilia RademeyerDivision of Medical Virology, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town and NHLS, Cape Town, South Africa.
Hyejin YoonTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Alan LapedesTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Hongmei GaoDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Kelli GreeneDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Mark K LouderVaccine Research Center, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Rui KongVaccine Research Center, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Salim Abdool KarimUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban Department of Immunology and Microbial Science, Durban, South Africa.
Dennis R BurtonThe Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Dan H BarouchCenter for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Michel C NussenzweigLaboratory of Molecular Immunology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, United States of America.
John R MascolaVaccine Research Center, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Lynn MorrisCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
David C MontefioriDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Bette KorberTheoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Michael S SeamanCenter for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USLos Alamos National Laboratory · USDuke Medical Center · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZARockefeller University · USScripps Research Institute · USUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Measurement of HIV Neutralization Using Quantitative AssaysZIAAI005010 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI MASCOLA, JOHN · 2009 to 2018
$7.6M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of a new generation of potent broadly neutralizing HIV-1 antibodies (bnAbs) has generated substantial interest in their potential use for the prevention and/or treatment of HIV-1 infection. While combinations of bnAbs targeting distinct epitopes on the viral envelope (Env) will likely be required to overcome the extraordinary diversity of HIV-1, a key outstanding question is which bnAbs, and how many, will be needed to achieve optimal clinical benefit. We assessed the neutralizing activity of 15 bnAbs targeting four distinct epitopes of Env, including the CD4-binding site (CD4bs), the V1/V2-glycan region, the V3-glycan region, and the gp41 membrane proximal external region (MPER), against a panel of 200 acute/early clade C HIV-1 Env pseudoviruses. A mathematical model was developed that predicted neutralization by a subset of experimentally evaluated bnAb combinations with high accuracy. Using this model, we performed a comprehensive and systematic comparison of the predicted neutralizing activity of over 1,600 possible double, triple, and quadruple bnAb combinations. The most promising bnAb combinations were identified based not only on breadth and potency of neutralization, but also other relevant measures, such as the extent of complete neutralization and instantaneous inhibitory potential (IIP). By this set of criteria, triple and quadruple combinations of bnAbs were identified that were significantly more effective than the best double combinations, and further improved the probability of having multiple bnAbs simultaneously active against a given virus, a requirement that may be critical for countering escape in vivo. These results provide a rationale for advancing bnAb combinations with the best in vitro predictors of success into clinical trials for both the prevention and treatment of HIV-1 infection.

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeutralizingEpitopesHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV InfectionsHumansAntibodies, NeutralizingEpitopesHIV Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID27028935
PMCPMC4814126
OpenAlexW2324835369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.