Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27028852›Full record

Trial reportOncotarget2016

A window of opportunity study of potential tumor and soluble biomarkers of response to preoperative erlotinib in early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Adrian G Sacher, Lisa W Le, Humberto Lara-Guerra, Thomas K Waddell, Shingo Sakashita, Zhuo Chen, Lucia Kim, Tong Zhang, Suzanne Kamel-Reid, Alexandra Salvarrey and 8 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. IASLC Multidisciplinary Recommendations for Pathologic Assessment of Lung Cancer Resection Specimens After Neoadjuvant Therapy.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adrian G SacherDivision of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Lisa W LeDepartment of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Humberto Lara-GuerraDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Thomas K WaddellDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Shingo SakashitaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Zhuo ChenDivision of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Lucia KimDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Tong ZhangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Suzanne Kamel-ReidDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Alexandra SalvarreyDivision of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Gail DarlingDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Kazuhiro YasufukuDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Shaf KeshavjeeDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Marc de PerrotDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Frances A ShepherdDivision of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Geoffrey LiuDivision of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Ming Sound TsaoDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Natasha B LeighlDivision of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
University Health Network · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CANewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundErlotinib is highly active in EGFR mutant NSCLC, but may benefit some with wild-type tumors. We examined pre-operative erlotinib in early stage NSCLC to assess response and correlation with potential biomarkers.

resultsTwenty-five patients were enrolled; 22 received erlotinib treatment and were evaluable (median follow-up 4.4 years). Histology was predominantly adenocarcinoma although 31% had squamous carcinoma. PET response was observed in 2 patients (9%), both with squamous carcinoma. Most (20/22) had stable disease (RECIST), with frequent minor radiographic regression and histologic findings of fibrosis/necrosis including in squamous histology. Only two had EGFR mutations identified, one with minor radiographic response and the other stable disease after 4 weeks of EGFR TKI. High pre-treatment serum levels of TGF-α correlated with primary resistance to erlotinib (p = 0.02), whereas high post-treatment soluble EGFR levels correlated with response (p = 0.03). EGFR, PTEN, cMET and AXL expression did not correlate with tumor response.

methodsClinical stage IA-IIB NSCLC patients received erlotinib 150 mg daily for 4 weeks followed by resection. Tumor response was assessed using CT, PET and pathological response. Tumor genotype was established using Sequenom Mass ARRAY; EGFR, PTEN, cMET and AXL expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry, circulating markers of EGFR activation (TGF-α, amphiregulin, epiregulin, EGFR ECD) by ELISA and EGFR, MET copy number by FISH.

conclusionsErlotinib appears to demonstrate activity in EGFR wild-type tumors including squamous carcinoma. Further research is needed to characterize those wild-type patients that may benefit from EGFR TKI and predictive biomarkers including TGF-α, EGFR copy and others.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungChemotherapy, AdjuvantErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorErlotinib HydrochlorideerlotinibNSCLCpreoperative window study

Identifiers

PMID27028852
PMCPMC5041932
OpenAlexW2332752715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.