Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27028625›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation biology2016

Analysis of gene expression in mouse brain regions after exposure to 1.9 GHz radiofrequency fields.

James P McNamee, Pascale V Bellier, Anne T M Konkle, Reuben Thomas, Siriwat Wasoontarajaroen, Eric Lemay, Greg B Gajda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James P McNameea Health Canada, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate , Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau , Ottawa ;
Pascale V Belliera Health Canada, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate , Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau , Ottawa ;
Anne T M Konkleb Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences , University of Ottawa , Ottawa , ON , Canada ;
Reuben Thomasc Gladstone Institutes , San Francisco , CA , USA ;
Siriwat Wasoontarajaroend Faculty of Engineering , Rajamangala University of Technology, Isan , Khon Kaen , Thailand.
Eric Lemaya Health Canada, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate , Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau , Ottawa ;
Greg B Gajdaa Health Canada, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate , Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau , Ottawa ;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess 1.9 GHz radiofrequency (RF) field exposure on gene expression within a variety of discrete mouse brain regions using whole genome microarray analysis. MATERIALS AND

methodsAdult male C57BL/6 mice were exposed to 1.9 GHz pulse-modulated or continuous-wave RF fields for 4 h/day for 5 consecutive days at whole body average (WBA) specific absorption rates of 0 (sham), ∼0.2 W/kg and ∼1.4 W/kg. Total RNA was isolated from the auditory cortex, amygdala, caudate, cerebellum, hippocampus, hypothalamus, and medial prefrontal cortex and differential gene expression was assessed using Illumina MouseWG-6 (v2) BeadChip arrays. Validation of potentially responding genes was conducted by RT-PCR.

resultsWhen analysis of gene expression was conducted within individual brain regions when controlling the false discovery rate (FDR), no differentially expressed genes were identified relative to the sham control. However, it must be noted that most fold changes among groups were observed to be less than 1.5-fold and this study had limited ability to detect such small changes. While some genes were differentially expressed without correction for multiple-comparisons testing, no consistent pattern of response was observed among different RF-exposure levels or among different RF-modulations.

conclusionsThe current study provides the most comprehensive analysis of potential gene expression changes in the rodent brain in response to RF field exposure conducted to date. Within the exposure conditions and limitations of this study, no convincing evidence of consistent changes in gene expression was found in response to 1.9 GHz RF field exposure.

Indexed as

MicrowavesAbsorption, RadiationAnimalsBrainDose-Response Relationship, RadiationGene Expression RegulationMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNerve Tissue ProteinsRadiation DosageTissue DistributionWhole-Body IrradiationNerve Tissue ProteinsbrainGene expressionmicroarraymouseradiofrequencyRT-PCR

Identifiers

PMID27028625
PMCPMC4898144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.